Ruling by
Mariano-Florentino CuéllarLower Court
Santa Clara County Superior CourtNo reversible error found in a 'Miranda' challenge, where the suspect was interviewed by two different officers about two different crimes, since officers were not required to readvise him of his Miranda rights.
Court
CASCCite as
2018 DJDAR 9292Published
Sep. 14, 2018Filing Date
Sep. 12, 2018Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
AffirmedTHE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CHRISTOPHER ALAN SPENCER,
Defendant and Appellant.
No. S057242
Santa Clara County
Super. Ct. No. 155731
Supreme Court of California
Filed September 12, 2018
THE COURT:
The opinion in this matter filed July 12, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 642, is modified as follows:
On page 677 of the opinion, the first sentence in the paragraph beginning, "With the exception of the photographs, Spencer does not appear to have objected to the introduction of the victim impact evidence" is modified to add "specifically" before "objected," "particular" before "victim," and "at issue" to end the sentence. As modified, the sentence will now read:
With the exception of the photographs, Spencer does not appear to have specifically objected to the introduction of the particular victim impact evidence at issue.
The footnote appended to this sentence (fn. 5) is unchanged.
This modification does not affect the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424
