Ruling by
Sandra L. MarguliesLower Court
San Francisco County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
John K. StewartArbitration agreement unconscionable under minimum requirements of 'Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.' because it limited employee's remedies and provided that employee must bear half the costs of arbitration.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 1DCA/1Cite as
2018 DJDAR 11303Published
Nov. 30, 2018Filing Date
Nov. 28, 2018Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Petition GrantedPetitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
Respondent;
WINSTON & STRAWN, LLP,
Real Party in Interest.
No. A153390
(San Francisco City & County
Super. Ct. No. CGC-17-561025)
California Courts of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division One
Filed November 28, 2018
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 2, 2018, be modified as follows:
1. On page 2, at the end of the first full paragraph, replace the last sentence that begins "Accordingly, we reverse and remand . . ." with the following sentence:
Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of mandate to allow Ramos to proceed with her claims in superior court.
There is no change in the judgment.
Dated:
Margulies, Acting P.J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424
Related Content
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Civil Litigation
Forced arbitration: where Rights go to die
By Michelle Erickson, Jahan C. Sagafi
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Civil Rights, Labor/Employment, Law Practice
A significant blow to firms looking to arbitrate discrimination claims
By Gay C. Grunfeld, Cara E. Trapani
