Ruling by
Richard M. AronsonLower Court
Orange County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Lewis W. ClappPenal Code Section 459.5(a)'s definition of 'shoplifting' is not used in its colloquial sense; thus, stealing property from private citizens and from a locker room in commercial establishment could constitute 'shoplifting.'
Court
California Courts of Appeal 4DCA/3Cite as
2019 DJDAR 33Published
Jan. 4, 2019Filing Date
Jan. 3, 2019Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Affirmed (in part)In re E.P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
E.P.,
Defendant and Appellant.
No. G054375
(Super. Ct. No. 16DL0229)
California Courts of Appeal
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three
Filed Jan. 3, 2019
ORDER DENYING REHEARING AND
MODIFYING OPINION;
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
The opinion filed on December 11, 2018, is hereby modified as follows:
On page 6, delete the entire paragraph beginning with "Nor does section 459.5, subdivision (b) . . ."
The petitions for rehearing are DENIED. This modification does not change the judgment.
ARONSON, ACTING P. J.
WE CONCUR:
FYBEL, J.
THOMPSON, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424
