Ruling by
Jon B. StreeterLower Court
San Francisco County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Anne BoulianePublic defender did not violate reciprocal discovery order; under 'Izazaga v. Superior Court' counsel did not reasonably anticipate it was likely he would call witness because he was undertaking minimal defense.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 1DCA/4Cite as
2019 DJDAR 1193Published
Feb. 11, 2019Filing Date
Feb. 7, 2019Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
ReversedTHE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADRIAN LANDERS,
Defendant;
MANOHAR RAJU,
Objector and Appellant.
No. A145037
(City & County of San Francisco
Super. Ct. No. 221100)
California Courts of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division Four
Filed February 7, 2019
Trial judge: Hon. Anne Bouliane
Counsel
Jeff Adachi, Public Defender (San Francisco), Matt Gonzalez, Chief Attorney, and Christopher F. Gauger, Deputy Public Defender for Objector and Appellant.
Laura Arnold for California Public Defender's Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Objector and Appellant.
Brendon D. Woods, Public Defender (Alameda), and Brian Bloom, Assistant Public Defender as Amici Curiae on behalf of Objector and Appellant.
Elizabeth K. Barker, Supervising Attorney and Garrick Byers, Special Assignment Attorney for Alternate Defender Office of Contra Costa County as Amici Curiae on behalf of Objector and Appellant.
George Gascón, District Attorney (San Francisco), Louise Ogden, Assistant District Attorney, and Joseph Frislid, Assistant District Attorney for Plaintiff.
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 14, 2019, be modified as follows:
1. On page 3, in subheading "B" entitled "Pretrial Investigation and Discovery by the Defense", delete the words "and Discovery."
2. On page 8, in the first sentence that starts with "Addressing specifically to the accusations of discovery default," delete the word "to" so the phrase reads, "Addressing specifically the accusations of discovery default,".
3. On page 13, in the first paragraph, in the sentence that starts, "Alternatively, an abuse of discretion will be found if the factual findings underlying the order under review are factually unsupported," delete the word "factual."
Dated: February 7, 2019
_______________________________ Acting P. J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424