Ruling by
Tani Cantil-SakauyeLower Court
Sacramento County Superior CourtCourt
CASCCite as
2020 DJDAR 1168Published
Feb. 14, 2020Filing Date
Feb. 11, 2020Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
AffirmedThe People,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Joe Edward Johnson,
Defendant and Appellant.
No. S029551
Sacramento County Superior Court
No. 58961
California Supreme Court
Filed February 11, 2020
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND
DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
THE COURT:
The majority opinion in this case, filed on November 25, 2019, and appearing at 8 Cal.5th 475, is modified as follows:
1. The first sentence of the third full paragraph on page 494 presently reads: "At a pretrial hearing on June 12, trial counsel indicated that they were ready to proceed with trial as scheduled." This sentence is modified to read as follows:
At a discovery sanctions hearing on June 12, the court confirmed the scheduled June 22 trial date, and counsel for both parties indicated that they anticipated proceeding with pretrial motions on that date.
2. The last sentence of the second full paragraph on page 501 presently reads: "Meanwhile, trial counsel advised the court on June 12 that they were ready to proceed with trial as scheduled." This sentence is modified to read as follows:
Meanwhile, trial counsel advised the court on June 12 that they intended to adhere to the existing trial schedule.
This modification does not affect the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390