This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Modification: People v. Beck and Cruz

Ruling by

Goodwin H. Liu

Lower Court

Alameda County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Edward M. Lacy Jr.
Evidence was collectively sufficient to corroborate accomplice's testimony and to demonstrate that defendants were part of a conspiracy to kill the victims.



Court

CASC

Cite as

2020 DJDAR 1153

Published

Feb. 14, 2020

Filing Date

Feb. 11, 2020

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Affirmed as Modified


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JAMES DAVID BECK and GERALD DEAN CRUZ,

Defendants and Appellants.

 

No. S029843

Alameda County Superior Court

110467-A and 110467-B

California Supreme Court

Filed February 11, 2010

 

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

 

THE COURT:

The opinion in this matter filed on December 2, 2019, and appearing at 8 Cal.5th 584, is modified as follows:

In the paragraph spanning pages 644 and 645, in the sentence beginning "We conclude there is no reasonable probability," the phrase "there is no reasonable probability Beck and Cruz were prejudiced by any error" is replaced by the phrase "the instructional error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." As modified, the sentence now reads:

 

We conclude the instructional error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

This modification does not change the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

#274767

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390