This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Modification: Schmidt v. Superior Court

Lower Court

Santa Barbara County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Thomas P. Anderle
A constitutional finding of judicial gender bias warranting reversal on due process grounds is only appropriate when 'extreme facts' demonstrate a probability of actual bias.



Court

California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/8

Cite as

2020 DJDAR 1181

Published

Feb. 18, 2020

Filing Date

Feb. 14, 2020

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Affirmed


 

TAMIKA SCHMIDT et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF VENTURA,

Defendant and Respondent.

 

 

No. B291385

(Santa Barbara County

Super. Ct. No. VENCI00479100)

California Courts of Appeal

Second Appellate District

Division Eight

Filed February 14, 2020

 

ORDER MODIFYING THE OPINION AND DENYING THE PETITION FOR REHEARING

 

[No change in Judgment]

 

THE COURT:

 

The opinion herein, filed on January 22, 2020, is modified to show the correct counsel listing as follows:

 

Law Office of Christie E. Webb, Christie E. Webb; Law Office of Judith Williams and Judith K. Williams for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

 

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

 

 

BIGELOW, P. J.

GRIMES, J.

WILEY, J.

 

 

#274777

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390