Ruling by
Marsha G. SloughLower Court
Riverside County Superior CourtDefendant was not entitled to relief under Penal Code Section 1170.95 because he was a major participant and acted with reckless indifference to human life.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 4DCA/2Cite as
2020 DJDAR 4593Published
May 15, 2020Filing Date
May 13, 2020Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
AffirmedTHE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
TERRELL LAW,
Defendant and Appellant.
The County of Riverside
No. E072845
(Super.Ct.No. RIF100589)
California Courts of Appeal
Fourth Appellate District
Division Two
Filed May 13, 2020
THE COURT
We deny appellant Terrell Law's petition for rehearing and modify the opinion filed in this matter on April 27, 2020 by inserting the following language to part II.B, section 2, at the top of page 19, in between the parenthetical ending with "crime only" and the sentence "Law's conduct is clearly distinguishable":
(See, e.g., In re Miller, supra, 14 Cal.App.5th at p. 965 [defendant played the role of "spotter" who would select the robbery target and was not at the scene of the robbery/murder]; In re Bennett (2018) 26 Cal.App.5th 1002, 1019 [defendant was involved in planning the robbery but was not at the scene of the murder]; Ramirez, supra, 32 Cal.App.5th at p. 404 [defendant acted as getaway driver and was not at the scene of the murder]; In re Taylor (2019) 34 Cal.App.5th 543, 559 [same].)
Except for this modification, which does not affect the judgment, the opinion remains unchanged.
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
SLOUGH, J.
We concur:
RAMIREZ, P. J.
MENETREZ, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424
