This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Modification: People v. Duarte-Lara

Ruling by

Ioana Petrou

Lower Court

San Francisco County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Michael B. McNaughton
'People v. Mayberry' instructions are not warranted unless defendant's mistake of consent was subjectively and objectively reasonable under circumstances.



Court

California Courts of Appeal 1DCA/3

Cite as

2020 DJDAR 5531

Published

Jun. 11, 2020

Filing Date

Jun. 9, 2020

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Affirmed


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RAFAEL DUARTE-LARA,

Defendant and Appellant.

 

No. A157186

(City and County of San Francisco

Super. Ct. No. SCN228229

California Courts of Appeal

First Appellate District

Division Three

Filed June 9, 2020

 

Trial Judge: Hon. Michael McNaughton

 

Counsel

 

Office of Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey M. Laurence, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Seth K. Schalit, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Katie L. Stowe, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

First District Appellant Project, Jennifer A. Mannix for Defendant and Appellant.

 

THE COURT:

 

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 22, 2020, is modified in the following respect:

 

At page 9, lines 3-9, delete the following text:

"(People v. Anderson (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 55, 60-62 [court held defendant entitled to avail himself of Mayberry instruction against two counts of forcible rape and two counts of forcible oral copulation on two girls 14 and 15 years of age]; see also People v. King (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1281, 1317-1318 [allowing defendant to avail himself of Mayberry instruction against forcible sexual penetration]; People v. Dillon (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1367, 1368 [accord]; see CALCRIM No. 1045.)"

 

The deleted text is to be replaced with the following text:

"(People v. Anderson (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 55, 60-62 [court held defendant entitled to avail himself of Mayberry instruction against two counts of forcible rape and two counts of forcible oral copulation on two girls 14 and 15 years of age]; see CALCRIM No. 1045.)"

This modification does not change the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

 

 

Dated: June 9, 2020

FUJISAKI, J. Acting P.J.

#275402

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390