Ruling by
Michael J. RaphaelLower Court
Riverside County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
James S. HawkinsIn order for use of deadly force to be justified as defense, intrusion must threaten death or serious bodily harm.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 4DCA/2Cite as
2020 DJDAR 6034Published
Jun. 22, 2020Filing Date
Jun. 18, 2020Opinion Type
OpinionDisposition Type
AffirmedSummary
Yi Chih Chen called the Riverside County Sheriff's Department for assistance with a neighbor dispute. Deputy Sheriff Christina Weber arrived at Chen's home. Chen asked that she stop his neighbors from taking down a shared fence that day. The neighbors, a married couple, sought to replace the fence and had hired contractors, but Chen objected to the plan. Weber explained to everyone that it was "a civil issue" and they should take the matter up in civil court. The fencing company hired by the neighbors arrived at around this time. Weber left but was sent back to the scene because Chen went upstairs to his bedroom and began pointing a shotgun from his window toward the neighbors and two of the contractors. Chen was charged with four counts of assault with a firearm, a felony, and one count of brandishing a firearm, a misdemeanor. The jury acquitted Chen on the assault charges and convicted him on the misdemeanor. Chen was granted summary probation for 36 months and allowed to serve, via an ankle monitor, the three months of mandatory jail time. Chen appealed, contending the court erred in excluding evidence about the neighbors' alleged failure to comply with the homeowners association rules because the violation would have shown he was defending his property.
Affirmed. Even in defending against someone committing a felony, where the "character of the crime, and the manner of its perpetration" "do not reasonably create a fear of great bodily harm," "there is no cause for exaction of a human life, or for the use of deadly force." People v. Ceballos. The present case was not a situation involving a home invasion, nor even a defense against some other crime potentially involving death or serious bodily harm. Nothing in the record indicated that the neighbors forcibly entered Chen's home or that they committed any felonies much less any that threatened death or serious bodily harm. Instead, the neighbors simply sought to remove and replace a shared fence. Accordingly, whether or not the neighbors complied with homeowners association rules or the Civil Code, Chen was not legally justified in brandishing a deadly firearm.
— Carlo Nardone
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424