This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Colorado Dept. of State v. Baca

Ruling by

Per Curiam (USSC)

Lower Court

10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Lower Court Judge

Carolyn B. McHugh

concurring Judge(s)

Clarence Thomas
Judgment of Tenth Circuit was reversed for reasons stated in 'Chiafalo v. Washington.'



Court

USSC

Cite as

2020 DJDAR 6902

Published

Jul. 7, 2020

Filing Date

Jul. 6, 2020

Opinion Type

Opinion

Disposition Type

Reversed

Summary

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit was reversed for the reasons stated in this Court's opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington.

— Silva Demirjian



SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

 

No. 19-518

 

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

PETITIONER

v.

MICHEAL BACA, ET AL.

 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

 

[July 6, 2020]

 

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ___.

It is so ordered.

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR took no part in the decision of this case.

JUSTICE THOMAS concurs in the judgment for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ___.

#275569

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390