Ruling by
John Shepard Wiley Jr.Lower Court
Los Angeles County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Yvette M. PalazuelosCourt
California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/8Cite as
2020 DJDAR 8264Published
Aug. 7, 2020Filing Date
Aug. 5, 2020Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
ReversedPICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION et al.,
Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
Defendant and Appellant.
No. B295935
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. BC616804)
California Courts of Appeal
Second Appellate District
Division 8
Filed August 5, 2020
THE COURT:
The opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on July 9, 2020 is modified as follows:
On page 32, the first paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following:
First, Pico argued the Act contains no dilution element at all. In its 95-page brief, Pico devoted only one sentence to this argument. An amicus brief also argued this point. At oral argument, however, Pico "for purposes of this argument" abandoned this argument, and for good reason.
There is no change in the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
BIGELOW, P. J.
GRIMES, J.
WILEY, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390