This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Modification: Pico Neighborhood Association v. City of Santa Monica

Lower Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Yvette M. Palazuelos
Parties must show the government acted with the goal of achieving a discriminatory end for a successful equal protection claim.



Court

California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/8

Cite as

2020 DJDAR 8264

Published

Aug. 7, 2020

Filing Date

Aug. 5, 2020

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Reversed


PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION et al.,

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,

Defendant and Appellant.

 

No. B295935

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC616804)

California Courts of Appeal

Second Appellate District

Division 8

Filed August 5, 2020

 

THE COURT:

 

The opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on July 9, 2020 is modified as follows:

On page 32, the first paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following:

 

First, Pico argued the Act contains no dilution element at all. In its 95-page brief, Pico devoted only one sentence to this argument. An amicus brief also argued this point. At oral argument, however, Pico "for purposes of this argument" abandoned this argument, and for good reason.

 

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

 

 

BIGELOW, P. J.

GRIMES, J.

WILEY, J.

#275774

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390