Modification: Skaff v. Rio Nido Roadhouse

RICHARD SKAFF,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

RIO NIDO ROADHOUSE,

Defendant and Appellant.

No. A152462, A153606

(Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCV-254094)

California Courts of Appeal

First Appellate District

Division One

Filed October 20, 2020

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the published opinion filed herein on October 5, 2020, be modified as follows:

On page 5, second paragraph, at the end of the second sentence, the words "and entrance" should not be bolded.

On page 15, in the second paragraph under section II of the Discussion, third sentence, the word "successful" is added between the words "Plaintiff's" and "injunction," so that the sentence reads: "Plaintiff's successful injunctive relief claim, however, was premised on violation of section 19955, not the ADA."

This modification does not change the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Humes, P.J.