Modification: People v. Zorich

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DAVID MITCHELL ZORICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

No. G058222

(Super. Ct. No. 98WF0576)

California Courts of Appeal

Fourth Appellate District

Division Three

Filed October 29, 2020

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION,

AND DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT

It is ordered that our opinion filed on October 13, 2020, be modified as follows:

1. On page 2, first paragraph, third sentence, change "the prosecution submitted nothing" to "the record reflects the prosecution submitted nothing."

2. On page 4, last paragraph, first sentence, change "if the value of the vehicle is under $950" to "if the value of the vehicle does not exceed $950."

3. On page 5, first incomplete paragraph, second line, change "if the vehicle is worth less than $950" to "if the vehicle's value does not exceed $950."

4. On page 5, first full paragraph, replace the first sentence as follows: "Thus, the key question the court was required to decide in this matter was whether the value of the 1979 AMC Concord defendant stole and illegally drove in 1997 exceeded $950 at the time."

5. On page 5, first full paragraph, last sentence, change "the vehicle was worth less than $950" to "the vehicle's value did not exceed $950."

6. On page 5, second full paragraph, last sentence, change "the vehicle was worth less than $950" to "the vehicle's value exceeded $950."

7. On page 6, last paragraph, last sentence, change "Further, the prosecutor submitted no evidence at all" to "Further, the record does not reflect the prosecutor submitted any evidence at all."

8. On page 9, first full paragraph, second sentence, change "because the district attorney did not produce any," to "there is no indication in the record the district attorney produced any."

This modification does not change the judgment. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

MOORE, ACTING P. J.

WE CONCUR:

FYBEL, J.

IKOLA, J.