Ruling by
Kenneth YeganLower Court
Santa Barbara County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
James E. HermanPost Release Community Supervision was enacted to rehabilitate nonviolent felons, not to reward the felon with custody credits that can theoretically reduce supervision period to zero.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/6Cite as
2020 DJDAR 13067Published
Dec. 9, 2020Filing Date
Dec. 8, 2020Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
AffirmedTHE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
NICOLAS ALLAN SHELP,
Defendant and Appellant.
2d Crim. No. B298753
(Super. Ct. No. 1498298H)
(Santa Barbara County)
California Courts of Appeal
Second Appellate District
Division Six
Filed December 8, 2020
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 20, 2020, be modified as follows:
1. On page 2, the second full paragraph, the first sentence, beginning "Appellant claims that" delete the words, "flash incarceration and," so that the sentence reads:
"Appellant claims that custody credits accrue with each PRCS jail incarceration, and the custody credits automatically shorten the three-year PRCS supervision period."
2. On page 7, the first paragraph, the second sentence, beginning "Based on appellant's view" delete the words "flash incarceration and," so that the sentence reads:
"Based on appellant's view of the PRCS statute (§ 3455, subd. (a)), the PRCS recidivist accumulates custody conducts with each jail sanction, and it collectively shortens the PRCS supervision period."
There is no change in judgment.
Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied.
GILBERT, P.J. YEGAN, J. PERREN, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424