This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Modification: Nagel v. Westen

Ruling by

Steven Z. Perren

Lower Court

Santa Barbara County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Colleen K. Sterne

Trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff's cause of action for fraudulent transfer under Uniform Voidable Transactions Act.





Court

California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/6

Cite as

2021 DJDAR 1219

Published

Feb. 3, 2021

Filing Date

Feb. 1, 2021

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Reversed


NICOLE NAGEL ET AL.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

TRACY A. WESTEN ET AL.,

Defendants and Respondents.

 

2d Civil No. B300552

(Super. Ct. No. 15CV01178)

(Santa Barbara County)

California Courts of Appeal

Second Appellate District

Division Six

Filed February 1, 2021

 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND MODIFYING OPINION

(No Change in Judgment)

 

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 7, 2021, be modified as set forth below:

1. On page 1, the second sentence in the first paragraph is modified to read as follows: They sold it to appellants Nicole Nagel and "ESY Investments" (Nagel) in 2011 for $4.12 million.

2. On page 1 and 2, the second sentence in the second paragraph is modified to read as follows: It awarded Nagel over $4.5 million for the loss of the home, which it held added no value to the land on which it stands.

3. On page 2, the second sentence in the first full paragraph is modified to read as follows: By the time ensuing and relatively fruitless efforts at collection were undertaken, Sellers had allegedly sent the bulk of their assets out of California including applying the proceeds of the sale to an expensive home in Texas to take advantage of that state's unlimited homestead exemption; and, with aid and counsel of Tracy Westen's siblings, placing additional assets in a variety of funds, annuities and investments in Nevada and Minnesota.

No change in judgment.

Appellants' petition for rehearing is denied.

 

 

GILBERT, P.J.

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.

#276789

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424