Modification: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City and County of San Francisco

HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Defendant and Respondent.

No. A157983

(San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-18-568657)

California Courts of Appeal

First Appellate District

Division Five

Filed February 22, 2021

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed January 27, 2021 be modified as follows:

On page 19, in the paragraph that begins the page, replace the sentence, "But Howard Jarvis does not contend that a single official's sponsorship of or involvement in an initiative gives rise to the inference that a city or county intentionally circumvented Propositions 13 and 218, or demonstrates that the official effectively controlled the initiative." with "But we fail to see how the sponsorship and involvement of the single official here gives rise to the inference that the City intentionally circumvented Propositions 13 and 218 or effectively controlled the initiative."

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellants' petition for rehearing is denied.

SIMONS, J, Acting P.J.