This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Modification: Li v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California)

Ruling by

Ronald B. Robie

Lower Court

Sacramento County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

James P. Arguelles
A trial court must account for the standard of proof in the underlying administrative proceeding when exercising its independent judgment.



Court

California Courts of Appeal 3DCA

Cite as

2021 DJDAR 10849

Published

Oct. 20, 2021

Filing Date

Oct. 19, 2021

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Petition Denied

Case Fully Briefed

Nov. 4, 2020

Oral Argument

Sep. 24, 2021


QUINN LI,

Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT

OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

Respondent;

MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA,

Real Party in Interest.

 

No. C092584

(Super. Ct. No. 34202080003396)

California Courts of Appeal

Third Appellate District

Filed October 19, 2021

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

 

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 30, 2021, be modified as follows:

At the end of part IV (Petitioner Fails To Show A Different Outcome Would Result) of the Discussion, add the following footnote:

In his petition for rehearing, petitioner asserts this court "erred as a matter of law under the facts and scope of this appeal" in failing to remand the matter to the "trial court to reexamine [his] request for reconsideration under [our analysis] on the heightened standard of review in [section] 1094.5 proceedings." Petitioner fails to acknowledge the trial court's order was not based solely on the Chamberlain standard of review. The trial court also denied the reconsideration motion under section 1008, subdivisions (a) and (e). Petitioner never addressed the propriety of that ground for the trial court's denial of his petition for reconsideration.

There is no change in the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

BY THE COURT:

 

 

Robie, Acting P. J.

Renner, J.

Krause, J.

#278246

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390