This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Modification: People v. McDaniel

Ruling by

Goodwin H. Liu

Lower Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Robert J. Perry

Admission of firearm was not error when officer had reasonable suspicion observing outline of gun in passenger's pocket.





Court

CASC

Cite as

2021 DJDAR 11024

Published

Oct. 22, 2021

Filing Date

Oct. 20, 2021

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Affirmed


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

 

The People,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Don'te Lamont McDaniel,

Defendant and Appellant.

 

No. S171393

Los Angeles County Superior Court

TA074274-01

Filed October 20, 2021

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND

DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

 

THE COURT:

The majority opinion in this matter, filed on August 26, 2021, and appearing at 12 Cal.5th 97, is modified as follows:

 

1. The second paragraph on page 120, beginning "The prosecutor explained that," is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following paragraph:

 

The prosecutor noted that Prospective Juror No. 46 believed that life without parole and the death penalty "are essentially the same because life in prison is not a life." The prosecutor also explained that the prospective juror did not believe the death penalty was a deterrent, "which is not an attitude that I considered to be a fair attitude." He was also concerned that Prospective Juror No. 46 listened to a "very liberal political radio station where they frequently have specials and guest speakers and interviews that are anti-death penalty advocates."

 

2. The second sentence of the second full paragraph on page 124, beginning "Comparing the final composition," is modified to add ", while not in itself decisive," after "pool" so that the sentence now reads:

 

Comparing the final composition of the jury to the overall pool, while not in itself decisive, reveals that Black jurors were overrepresented on the jury, even factoring in the disallowed strike of Prospective Juror No. 46.

 

This modification does not affect the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied. Defendant's request for modification of the opinion is denied.

 

#278264

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424