Ruling by
Charles S. PoochigianLower Court
Kern County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Kenneth C. Twisselman IIA gang enhancement did not require a showing that an umbrella gang and local subset were connected, because the umbrella gang alone satisfied the requirements.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 5DCACite as
2022 DJDAR 1863Published
Feb. 28, 2022Filing Date
Feb. 24, 2022Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Affirmed as ModifiedCase Fully Briefed
Dec. 18, 2019THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
GUILLERMO VASQUEZ et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
No. F078228
(Kern Super. Ct. No. BF167343A)
California Courts of Appeal
Fifth Appellate District
Filed February 24, 2022
Order Modifying Opinion and Denying Rehearing
[No Change in Judgment]
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 9, 2022, be modified in the following particulars:
1. On page 10, the first sentence in footnote 9, is modified to read: "The Attorney General concedes that AB 333's amendments to section 186.22 apply retroactively to defendants."
There is no change in the judgment. Respondent's petition for rehearing is denied.
POOCHIGIAN, J.
WE CONCUR:
LEVY, Acting P. J.
DE SANTOS, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424
