Ruling by
Gail Ruderman FeuerLower Court
Los Angeles County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
James C. ChalfantRedevelopment displays qualify as an on-premises display exempt from Outdoor Advertising Act requirements if the display advertises businesses in the area and is not merely incidental.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/7Cite as
2022 DJDAR 4778Published
May 13, 2022Filing Date
May 11, 2022Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Reversed and RemandedCase Fully Briefed
Mar. 17, 2022Oral Argument
Apr. 7, 2022Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Defendant and Respondent.
No. B304897
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. BS173417)
California Court of Appeal
Second Appellate District
Division Seven
Filed May 11, 2022
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
NO CHANGE IN APPELLATE JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
The above-entitled opinion filed on May 10, 2022 is modified as follows:
On page 1, add the following attorney information below paragraph 3:
Kane Ballmer and Berkman, Royce K. Jones and Bruce C. Gridley for City of Inglewood, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner and Appellant.
There is no change in the appellate judgment.
PERLUSS, P.J.
SEGAL, J.
FEUER, J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424
