This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Modification: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court (State of California)

Ruling by

Stuart R. Pollak

Lower Court

San Francisco County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Ethan P. Schulman

Prior notice from the California State Controller is not a prerequisite of liability under the California False Claims Act.





Court

California Courts of Appeal 1DCA/4

Cite as

2022 DJDAR 12415

Published

Dec. 14, 2022

Filing Date

Dec. 12, 2022

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Petition Denied

Oral Argument

Oct. 4, 2022


JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Respondent;

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. KEN ELDER,

Real Party in Interest.

 

No. A164519

(City & County of San Francisco

Super. Ct. No. CGC1957914)

California Court of Appeal

First Appellate District

Division Four

Filed December 12, 2022

 

U.S. BANK N.A.,

Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Respondent;

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. KEN ELDER,

Real Party in Interest.

 

No. A164521

(City & County of San Francisco

Super. Ct. No. CGC19581373)

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; AND DENYING PETITIONS FOR REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

 

 

THE COURT:

 

It is ordered that the opinion filed on November 18, 2022, be modified as follows:

 

1. On page 3, line 1 of the first full paragraph, replace "Section 1511 adds an additional requirement to this general rule" with "Section 1511 adds a separate requirement to this general rule."

 

2. On page 14, line 9, replace the sentence "Unlike the AKS, willfulness is not an element of the CFCA provisions the banks are alleged to have violated here" with "Unlike the AKS, willfulness is not an element of the UPL provisions the banks are alleged to have violated here."

 

There is no change in the judgment.

Petitioners' petitions for rehearing, filed December 5, 2022, are denied.

 

December 12, 2022 POLLAK, P.J.

 

 

Trial court: San Francisco County Superior Court

Trial judge: Honorable Ethan P. Schulman

Counsel for Petitioner JPMorgan Chasebank, N.A.:

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Douglas W. Baruch

Jennifer M. Wollenberg

Neaha P. Raol

Thomas M. Peterson

Joseph E. Floren

 

Counsel for Petitioner U.S. Bank National Association:

BUCKLEY LLP

James R. McGuire

Sarah N. Davis

Andrew W. Schilling (Pro Hac Vice)

Jackson Hagen (Pro Hac Vice)

 

Counsel for Respondent:

No appearance

Counsel for Amicus Curiae, Attorney General, the State of California-Rob Bonta

Attorney General Of California

Matthew Rodriquez

Chief Assistant Attorney General

Martin H. Goyette

Senior Assistant Attorney General

Jacqueline Dale

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Brendan Ruddy

Deputy Attorney General

 

Counsel for Real Party in Interest Ken Elder:-SILVER GOLUB & TEITELL LLP

David S. Golub

 

DENVER LAW GROUP

Michael P. Denver

 

GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE LLP

Michael S. Devorkin

#280387

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424