This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Modification: County of Butte v. Dept. of Water Resources

Lower Court

Yolo County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Daniel P. Maguire

California's environmental impact report for licensed hydropower facilities was sufficient because whether climate change necessitated project operation changes was too uncertain to evaluate.





Court

California Courts of Appeal 3DCA

Cite as

2023 DJDAR 3910

Published

May 2, 2023

Filing Date

May 1, 2023

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Affirmed

Case Fully Briefed

Jul. 31, 2013

Oral Argument

Sep. 24, 2018


 

COUNTY OF BUTTE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES,

Defendant and Respondent;

STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, INC., et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

 

 

COUNTY OF PLUMAS et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES,

Defendant and Respondent;

STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, INC., et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

 

 

No. C071785

(Super. Ct. No. CVCV091258)*

California Courts of Appeal

Third Appellate District

(Yolo)

Filed May 1, 2023

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

 

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

 

 

 

 

THE COURT:

 

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 7, 2023, be modified as follows:

 

1.       On page 16, the second sentence of the first full paragraph, beginning "And while true that DWR did not discuss" is deleted and the following sentence is inserted in its place:

 

And while true that DWR did not discuss each of these authorities in its EIR, it still conveyed much of the same type of information.

 

This modification does not change the judgment. Appellants' petition for rehearing is denied.

 

 

FOR THE COURT:

/s/

ROBIE, Acting P. J.

/s/

HULL, J.

/s/

BOULWARE EURIE, J.

 

 

EDITORIAL LISTING

 

 

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, Daniel P. Maguire, Judge. Affirmed.

 

Bruce Alpert, Brad J. Stephens, County Counsel; Rossmann and Moore, Antonio Rossmann, Roger B. Moore, Barton Lounsbury; Law Office of Roger B. Moore, Roger B. Moore; Shute Mihaly & Weinberger and Ellison Folk for Plaintiff and Appellant County of Butte.

 

R. Craig Settlemire, Gretchen Stuhr, County Counsel; Law Office of Roger B. Moore, Roger B. Moore; Law Offices of Michael B. Jackson and Michael B. Jackson for Plaintiffs and Appellants County of Plumas and Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.

 

E. Robert Wright for Friends of the River and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

 

Kamala D. Harris, Xavier Becerra, and Rob Bonta, Attorneys General, Robert W. Byrne, Assistant Attorney General, Randy L. Barrow, Tracy L. Winsor, Deborah L. Barnes, Russell B. Hildreth and Matthew J. Goldman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

 

The Sohagi Law Group, Margaret M. Sohagi, Philip A. Seymour; Duane Morris, Thomas M. Berliner, Paul J. Killion, Jolie-Anne S. Ansley; Downey Brand, David R.E. Aladjem, Meredith Nikkel and Rebecca R.A. Smith for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

 

 

 

* Two cases (Nos. 144282, 144283) were consolidated and transferred from the Butte County Superior Court to the Yolo County Superior Court (No. CVCV091258).

 

#280975

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424