Ruling by
Ioana PetrouLower Court
San Francisco County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Ethan P. SchulmanDemurrer inappropriate where complaint incorrectly designated statutory remedy as cause of action but alleged facts sufficient to support causes of action that could serve as a basis for such recovery.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 1DCA/3Cite as
2023 DJDAR 4300Published
May 16, 2023Filing Date
May 15, 2023Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Reversed and RemandedCase Fully Briefed
Nov. 23, 2022Oral Argument
Apr. 7, 2023RYAN BERRY,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
JEFFERY R. FRAZIER, DVM,
Defendant and Respondent.
No. A164168
(County and City of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CGC20587086)
California Court of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division Three
Filed May 15, 2023
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
BY THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed on April 28, 2023, be modified as follows:
On page 4, replace the first full paragraph with the following paragraph:
Frazier and an assistant arrived at Berry's home in the late afternoon. The euthanasia was to take place in the backyard, where Frazier and his assistant prepared the cat for the insertion of a catheter. During this initial attempt to sedate the cat, Frazier told Kraus and Berry, " 'Go over there,' '' indicating they should move 30 feet away. They complied, and waited for Frazier to indicate when they could return. After a few moments, Frazier told them that he was unable to place the catheter even though he had tried to do so in all the cat's limbs. Berry and Kraus became upset and Kraus suggested an overdose of an oral medication (buprenorphine) that had been prescribed for the cat. Frazier responded that it would " 'take too long,' " but did not explain how long or why the length of time was significant.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
There is no change in the judgment.
P.J.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424