This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Modification: Glassman v. Safeco Insurance Company of America

Ruling by

Helen E. Williams

Lower Court

Santa Clara County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Peter H. Kirwan
Prejudgment interest was denied where the arbitration award did not make clear whether defendant could have readily ascertained the amount owed.



Court

California Courts of Appeal 6DCA

Cite as

2023 DJDAR 4472

Published

May 19, 2023

Filing Date

May 17, 2023

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Affirmed

Case Fully Briefed

Oct. 3, 2022

Oral Argument

Feb. 7, 2023


SHERRY A. GLASSMAN,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendant and Respondent.

 

No. H049825

(Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 21CV383782)

California Court of Appeal

Sixth Appellate District

Filed May 17, 2023

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

 

BY THE COURT:

 

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 28, 2023, be modified as follows:

 

1. On page 2, line 8, the word "Company" is to be inserted between the words "Insurance" and "of" so the sentence reads:

 

In this case, appellant Sherry A. Glassman prevailed in a UIM arbitration against respondent Safeco Insurance Company of America.

 

2. On page 3, the first two sentences of the first full paragraph are deleted and replaced with the following two sentences:

 

After Glassman petitioned the trial court to confirm the arbitration award, she also sought prejudgment interest under section 3287, subdivision (a) (section 3287(a)) from the date of her CCP section 998 offer. This subdivision provides a right to prejudgment interest when a person "is entitled to recover damages certain, or capable of being made certain by calculation" (§ 3287(a)), and the right to recover is vested in the person on a particular day."

 

There is no change in judgment.

 

WILLIAMS, J.*

GROVER, ACTING P.J.

LIE, J.

 

* Judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#281044

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390