Ruling by
Helen E. WilliamsLower Court
Monterey County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Marla O. AndersonCity was not required to include school project alternatives stemming from a potential lack of funding in its environmental impact report.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 6DCACite as
2023 DJDAR 9337Published
Sep. 11, 2023Filing Date
Sep. 7, 2023Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Reversed and RemandedCase Fully Briefed
Dec. 9, 2022Oral Argument
Jul. 13, 2023
SANTA RITA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT et al.,
Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
CITY OF SALINAS,
Defendant;
REXFORD TITLE, INC., et al.,
Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.
No. H049854
(Monterey County Super. Ct. No. 20CV000242)
California Court of Appeal
Sixth Appellate District
Filed September 7, 2023
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
BY THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 10, 2023, be modified as follows:
1. On page 7, starting on line 11, the phrase beginning with "citing section" and ending on line 12 with "section 15186," is deleted so the sentence reads:
The EIR also noted that future site-specific environmental review would be required for each new school from the responsible school district as lead agency before approval of as yet unknown designs for each facility.
There is no change in judgment.
Respondent's petition for rehearing is denied.
WILLIAMS, J.*
WE CONCUR:
DANNER, ACTING P.J.
WILSON, J.
* Judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424