This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Modification: People v. Cartwright

Ruling by

William S. Dato

Lower Court

San Diego County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Frederick L. Link

Footage from City ID streetlight camera of defendant's robbery did not violate Fourth Amendment because defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy on San Diego street during the day.





Court

California Courts of Appeal 4DCA/1

Cite as

2024 DJDAR 1328

Published

Feb. 16, 2024

Filing Date

Feb. 15, 2024

Opinion Type

Modification

Disposition Type

Affirmed

Case Fully Briefed

Oct. 4, 2023


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KEVIN EUGENE CARTWRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant.

 

No. D080606

(Super. Ct. No. SCD279043)

California Court of Appeal

Fourth Appellate District

Division One

Filed February 15, 2024

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

 

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

 

THE COURT:

 

It is ordered that the opinion filed January 25, 2024 be modified as follows:

 

1. Delete the first sentence at the top of page 7 that begins, "Further, the still images," and replace it with the following two sentences:

 

Further, the still images included in the record from the City's cameras are not dissimilar in scope to the views obtained from the private security camera behind the clothing shop. They effectively capture the same scene from a different angle.

 

2. The two images on page 7 are deleted and replaced with the below images in the following order:

 

See Figure 1 at https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/D080606M.PDF

See Figure 2 at https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/D080606M.PDF

 

The petition for rehearing is denied.

 

There is no change in judgment.

 

HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

#282248

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424