Ruling by
Mark B. SimonsLower Court
Alameda County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Michael M. MarkmanResolution was a legislative act subject to referendum power because it was the initial policy determination regarding use of public funds to construct a park and improvements.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 1DCA/5Cite as
2024 DJDAR 2499Published
Mar. 19, 2024Filing Date
Mar. 15, 2024Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Reversed and RemandedCase Fully Briefed
Oct. 3, 2023Oral Argument
Feb. 22, 2024CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*
MOVE EDEN HOUSING et al.,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
CITY OF LIVERMORE et al.,
Defendants and Respondents;
EDEN HOUSING, INC.,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
No. A167346
(Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 22CV015399)
California Court of Appeal
First Appellate District
Division Five
Filed March 15, 2024
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT:
Respondents' March 14, 2024, petition for rehearing is denied. It is ordered that this court's opinion filed on March 6, 2024, is modified as follows:
1. On page 29, the disposition is now modified to read:
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the superior court with directions to issue a peremptory writ of mandate ordering respondents to process the referendum petition as required by the Elections Code. The superior court's order requiring plaintiffs to file an undertaking under Code of Civil Procedure section 529.2 is also reversed. Costs on appeal are awarded to plaintiffs/appellants.
The modification effects no change in the judgment.
SIMONS, J.
WE CONCUR:
JACKSON, P. J.
CHOU, J.
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part V.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424