Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
97-36120
|
Tackett v. Apfel
Vocational expert is required to determine whether social security applicant is disabled when his type of nonexertional limitations weren't contemplated by the agency. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 19, 2000 | |
98-71294
|
Crown Pacific v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
Regulation of 'mounting and demounting of rim wheels' isn't applicable to employer who isn't engaged in that kind of business. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 15, 2000 | |
99-3310
|
Wilson v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 15, 2000 | |
99-5152
|
Pilgrim v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 15, 2000 | |
99-7128
|
Armer v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 15, 2000 | |
99-1179
|
Gass v. U.S. Department of Treasury
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 15, 2000 | |
99-8056
|
Bischoff v. Myers
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 15, 2000 | |
97-56727
|
Verduzco v. Apfel
Administrative law judge doesn't exhibit ethnic bias in benefits hearing by expressing incredulity at applicant's claim of inability to speak English. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 12, 2000 | |
98-16462
|
Gutierrez v. Apfel
Plausible mental-impairment claim for disability benefits requires administrative law judge to complete psychiatric evaluation form and append it to decision. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 9, 2000 | |
99-7109
|
Nash v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 6, 2000 | |
99-5063
|
St. Clair v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
99-3251
|
Rhoten v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
A087191
|
Utility Cost Management v. East Bay Municipal Utility District
Limitations period of Government Code Section 66022 applies to action for refund from municipal utility district. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 1, 2000 | |
99-7076
|
Gore v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 24, 2000 | |
99-2156
|
Montoya v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 17, 2000 | |
98SA425
|
Jarco Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Commission acted pursuant to its authority and did not violate petitioner's constitutional rights. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 17, 2000 | |
00SA35
|
Aisenberg v. Campbell (Matter of the Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause)
Titles violate constitutional requirement of correctly and fairly expressing initiatives' true intent and meaning. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 17, 2000 | |
00SA49
|
Aisenberg v. Campbell (Matter of the Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause)
Board's titles clearly and correctly express subject of initiatives. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 17, 2000 | |
99-6167
|
Norris v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
98-35780
|
Harman v. Apfel
District court decision to remand disability benefits case back to Social Security Administration for further proceedings is reviewable for abuse of discretion. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 5, 2000 | |
98-16766
|
Balice v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
Mitigating factors and grower's ability to pay need not be considered when imposing fines under Agriculture Marketing Agreement Act. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 5, 2000 | |
A087250
|
Pacific Bell v. PUC
Public utility service may not make proposed tariff changes without following the PUC's formal procedures. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 5, 2000 | |
F030847
|
Alford v. DMV
DMV may impose a more severe penalty than that recommended by the administrative law judge. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 5, 2000 | |
S065485
|
Leone v. Medical Board of California
Statute may provide, without violating state constitution, that appellate review of physician licensing matters may only be obtained through extraordinary writ. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 5, 2000 | |
98-16047
|
AT&T Communications System v. Pacific Bell
Exhaustion of remedies isn't prerequisite to review of California Public Utilities Commission orders by California state courts. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 5, 2000 | |
98-16322
|
Rucker v. Davis
Public housing agency may evict tenant because of household member's drug-related activity even though tenant is unaware of activity. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 4, 2000 | |
E023997
|
Tellis v. Contractors State License Board
Licensed contractor violates state regulations when he knows his work is substandard and fails to correct defects. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 4, 2000 | |
98SC600
|
Department of Human Services v. May
Agreement between state agency and local college creating 'lab school' for education of juvenile offenders is constitutional. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 2, 2000 | |
99-2236
|
Sanchez v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Apr. 19, 2000 | |
99-6216
|
Leeper v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Apr. 19, 2000 |