| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B110436
|
Wellpoint Health Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court (McCombs)
Law firm's prelitigation investigation into circumstances surrounding employee's claims can be protected by attorney-client privilege. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
A075264
|
Forrest v. Baeza
Dual representation of corporation and directors is impermissible, but disqualified attorney can represent one party. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
89-O-11498
|
Anderson v. State Bar
Chief Trial Counsel Office has burden to prove attorney's statements impugning judges' integrity are false. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 9, 1999 | |
|
S066034
|
Wiley v. County of San Diego
Malpractice finding against public defender is invalid after transcript is correctly admitted and other evidence excluded. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
95-C-12630
|
Sawyer v. State Bar
Attorney's 3-year actual suspension for misdemeanor conviction is too harsh and is reduced. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
A075777
|
Trans-action Commercial Investors Ltd. v. Firmaterr Inc.
Counsel cannot be ordered to pay opposing party fees and costs as sanction for causing mistrial. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
95-O-14361
|
Wiener v. State Bar
Disciplined attorney placed on probation is required to file quarterly probation reports. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 6, 1999 | |
|
G021381
|
Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners L.P. v. Superior Court (The Parsons Corp.)
General unity of interests between corporate entities doesn't turn nonclient into client for attorney disqualification. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 6, 1999 | |
|
B113848
|
Truitt v. Superior Court (The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.)
Sanctions for ex parte communication are improper since attorneys didn't know opposing party had counsel. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 4, 1999 | |
|
A080116
|
Gilbert v. National Corp. for Housing Partnership
Party is not deprived of due process rights where court disqualified her attorney because of conflict of interest. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 3, 1999 | |
|
95-O-13943 and 95-O-15779
|
Greenwood v. State Bar
Default is final 45 days after entry absent lack of notice and compelling circumstances. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 3, 1999 | |
|
H016088
|
City of Morgan Hill v. Seltzer
Terminated attorney doesn't have ownership interest or lien upon fees owing from client to firm. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 3, 1999 | |
|
96-36262 and 96-36263
|
Widrig v. Apfel
Court doesn't abuse discretion in calculating attorney fees award in Social Security cases. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 3, 1999 | |
|
91-O-03890, 92-O-20254, 93-O-18769 and 93-O-19984
|
Yagman v. State Bar
Several conduct violations, including failure to pay client and unconscionable fee, require attorney's suspension. |
Attorneys |
|
May 26, 1999 | |
|
G021209
|
Smith, Smith & Kring v. Superior Court (Oliver)
Relationship between law firm and plaintiffs isn't sufficient to support recusing firm from representing defendants. |
Attorneys |
|
May 26, 1999 | |
|
92-O-19280
|
Priamos v. State Bar
Engaging in business transactions with client and self-dealing with client's funds warrants recommendation for disbarment. |
Attorneys |
|
May 21, 1999 | |
|
95-H-15573
|
Posthuma v. State Bar
Dismissal of public reproval proceeding for failure to comply with conditions of private reproval is error. |
Attorneys |
|
May 21, 1999 | |
|
S057125
|
Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank P.C. v. Superior Court (ESQ Business Services Inc.)
Law firm not licensed in California isn't entitled to fees for work done within state. |
Attorneys |
|
May 13, 1999 | |
|
S057125
|
Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C. v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County
Law firm not licensed in California isn't entitled to fees for work done within state. |
Attorneys |
|
May 13, 1999 | |
|
95-O-15585
|
Respondent Y. v. State Bar
Attorney is required to report sanctions order notwithstanding pending appeal. |
Attorneys |
|
May 10, 1999 | |
|
B108182 and B112258
|
Vaccaro v. Kaiman
Trial court abuses discretion by dismissing action with prejudice for lack of signature on amended complaint. |
Attorneys |
|
May 10, 1999 | |
|
95-R-16159
|
Salant v. State Bar
Reinstatement is recommended for attorney after 10 years of demonstrable rehabilitation. |
Attorneys |
|
May 2, 1999 | |
|
92-O-10612, 93-O-10686 and 94-O-15604
|
Moriarty v. State Bar
Disbarment recommended for attorney who commits repeated acts of deceit over six years. |
Attorneys |
|
May 2, 1999 | |
|
93-O-14534, 94-O-14813, 95-O-10936, 95-O-12847, 95-O-17260, 95-O-17874, 96-O-00264 and 96-O-00601
|
Doran v. State Bar
Violations of fidelity to clients, combined with trust account abuses, warrant six months' actual suspension. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 19, 1999 | |
|
A076627
|
Loube v. Loube
Position taken by attorneys on behalf of clients isn't binding on the attorneys when later sued by clients. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
|
B112133
|
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WPS Inc. (Telanoff)
Although attorney's inadvertent disclosure of privileged information isn't a waiver, receiving attorney using the disclosure shouldn't get sanctions. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
|
96-O-01784
|
Rodriguez v. State Bar
Incomplete record of proceeding before hearing judge doesn't permit independent review of discipline recommendation. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 12, 1999 | |
|
97-1192
|
Swidler & Berlin v. United States
Attorney-client privilege survives death of client and shields attorney notes from grand jury subpoena. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 11, 1999 | |
|
A074636
|
Estate of Condon
Out-of-state attorney who prepared estate in Colorado is entitled to attorney fees for services rendered in California. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 7, 1999 | |
|
95-R-17414
|
Ainsworth v. State Bar
Favorable testimony and sitting for legal courses isn't enough for disbarred attorney to get reinstated. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 5, 1999 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com