For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Chapman v. Skype Inc.
Consumer may continue to litigate class action alleging Skype deceptively labels calling plans “Unlimited” although they have many restrictions. 		Business Law Oct. 7, 2013
Simpson v. The Kroger Corp.
Labels on tubs of spreadable butter products do not trick consumers into thinking they are buying standard butter where they clearly stated products had other ingredients. 		Business Law Sep. 26, 2013
People v. Persolve LLC
California may pursue unfair competition claim against debt collection agency and its attorneys for allegedly making unlawful threats to debtors in demand letters. 		Business Law Aug. 16, 2013
Rose v. Bank of America N.A.
Claims under California’s unfair competition law may be based on federal Truth in Savings Act, which regulates banks’ disclosures to customers. 		Business Law Aug. 2, 2013
Murphy v. DirecTV Inc.
Customers who claimed that DirecTV deceived them with scheme to make them think they had purchased service equipment must arbitrate claims. 		Business Law Jul. 31, 2013
Donlen v. Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co. does not get new trial after consumer won lemon law lawsuit due to persistent transmission problems in new truck. 		Business Law Jul. 9, 2013
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Merchants may not file class action against credit card company after waiving right to do so, despite high costs of individually arbitrating. 		Business Law Jun. 20, 2013
Flores v. Chevron USA Inc.
Gas stations may require customers to submit their zip codes when making purchases with credit cards in order to prevent fraud. 		Business Law Jun. 20, 2013
Donlen v. Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co. does not get new trial after consumer won lemon law lawsuit due to persistent transmission problems in new truck. 		Business Law Jun. 16, 2013
Vargas v. SAI Monrovia B Inc.
Arbitration provision in sales contract for new car may not be enforced because provision was placed on back side of lengthy one page document. 		Business Law Jun. 5, 2013
Mississippi, ex rel. Hood v. Au Optronics Corp.
Order 		Business Law May 29, 2013
Hinojos v. Kohl's Corp.
Consumer may sue retailer for false advertising in relation to 'on sale' items by alleging he would not have bought items absent misrepresentation. 		Business Law May 22, 2013
Northwest, Inc., et al. v. Ginsberg
Order 		Business Law May 21, 2013
In re Tobacco Cases I
California is entitled to attorney fees from tobacco company after stopping use of cartoons in advertising under consent decree. 		Business Law May 21, 2013
Heritage Pacific Financial LLC v. Monroy
Debt collector violates federal statute prohibiting deceptive or misleading conduct in collection of debt by filing unmeritorious fraud claim against consumer. 		Business Law Apr. 29, 2013
Ramirez v. Balboa Thrift and Loan
Court incorrectly declines to certify class on unfair competition claim alleging creditor failed to include contract reinstatement conditions in notice of intent to sell vehicles. 		Business Law Apr. 23, 2013
Law Offices of Mathew Higbee v. Expungement Assistance Services
Law firm may sue online legal services provider for unfair competition based on unauthorized practice of law, even though they never directly engaged in business. 		Business Law Mar. 15, 2013
Tomatoes Extraordinaire Inc. v. Berkley
Produce supplier cannot invoke Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act against company absent proof that company qualified as ‘dealer’ as defined under Act. 		Business Law Mar. 11, 2013
Marx v. General Revenue Corp.
Debt collection agency may recover costs after prevailing in lawsuit over debt collection practices against woman who defaulted on her student loan. 		Business Law Feb. 27, 2013
Brakke v. Economic Concepts Inc.
Corporation's principals fail to show pension plan marketer's alleged misrepresentations concerning tax consequences of benefit pension plan were fraudulent. 		Business Law Feb. 7, 2013
Apple Inc v. Superior Court (Krescent)
Online retailer is not prohibited from requiring customer’s personal information when accepting credit card as payment for electronically downloaded products. 		Business Law Feb. 5, 2013
Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions Inc.
Statute of limitations does not bar unfair competition law claim related to excess charges when company had continuing duty not to impose unfair charges. 		Business Law Jan. 24, 2013
People v. JTH Tax Inc.
Tax service provider’s failure to disclose handling fees for certain bank products violates Truth in Lending Act because such fees are finance charges. 		Business Law Jan. 21, 2013
Rojas v. Platinum Auto Group Inc.
Car purchaser may sue dealership for misstating down payment's nature and amount on sales contract, regardless of whether he suffered actual damage. 		Business Law Jan. 15, 2013
Flores v. West Covina Auto Group
Dealership may force arbitration of claims by purchaser of previously owned car based on sales contract waiving right to classwide arbitration. 		Business Law Jan. 13, 2013
Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Class action moves forward against debt collection service to stop use of automated system to dial debtors' cellular telephone numbers. 		Business Law Dec. 30, 2012
Chesbro v. Best Buy Stores L.P.
Best Buy must stop making automated phone calls urging customers to redeem coupons by making more purchases at its stores. 		Business Law Dec. 27, 2012
U.S. v. Bormes
Attorney cannot sue government for alleged consumer protection violations when client's electronic federal-court filing receipt contained credit card information. 		Business Law Nov. 14, 2012
Ayyad v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
Telephone company may not compel arbitration of customer dispute involving early termination fees when issue had previously been decided. 		Business Law Oct. 30, 2012
Chesbro v. Best Buy Stores L.P.
Best Buy must stop making automated phone calls urging customers to redeem coupons by making more purchases at its stores. 		Business Law Oct. 18, 2012
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.