Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
97-16383
|
Valley Engineers Inc. v. Electric Engineering Co.
Dismissal is appropriate sanction for concealment of critical document and false statements under oath. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
B112529
|
Tliche v. Quathem
Failure to serve complaint in period prescribed by 'fast track' rules doesn't warrant dismissal. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
A082078
|
Kressler v. Troup
Notice of appeal filed more than three months after motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict is untimely. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 11, 1999 | |
98-0302
|
Martinez v. Binsfield
An arbitration action must proceed under the schedule for civil actions referred to arbitration. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 10, 1999 | |
97-0409
|
Hill v. City of Phoenix
A notice of appeal which doesn't refer to the judgment appealed from, is nevertheless valid. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 10, 1999 | |
98-316
|
Office of the President v. Office of Independent Counsel
Evidentiary privilege doesn't allow secret service personnel to refuse to testify in judicial proceedings. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 10, 1999 | |
B117044
|
Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp.
Leave to amend granted although claim not scheduled as bankruptcy asset. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 8, 1999 | |
E017825
|
People v. $241,600 United States Currency; Anderson, Sr.
Civil forfeiture claimant has standing despite signing waiver to money. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 8, 1999 | |
98-6310
|
Mehdipour v. Mehdipour
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 8, 1999 | |
B118114
|
Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology International et al.
In post-trial motion to add additional judgment debtor, burden of proof is 'by preponderance of the evidence', unless statute states otherwise. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 1999 | |
B114612
|
Rochin v. Pat Johnson Manufacturing Company
Amended judgment entered on an ex parte basis without notice to plaintiff is void. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 2, 1999 | |
B116425
|
Moore v. Liu
Dismissing Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation case, before motion to strike hearing, doesn't prevent attorney fee award. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
98-1242
|
Swanger v. Beebe
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
B125877
|
Countrywide Home Loans Inc. v. Superior Court (HP Lemona II)
In alleged scheme to defraud involving multiple wrongdoers, plaintiff may choose which tortfeasor to sue. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
B116425
|
Moore v. Liu
Dismissing Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation case, before motion to strike hearing, doesn't prevent attorney fee award. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
B112261
|
Westside Hospital v. Belshe
Agency's 'final decision' is issued when adopted, not when mailed. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
A077629
|
U.S. Golf Assn. v. Arroyo Software
Where there is no prevailing party, trial court doesn't abuse its discretion by not awarding costs. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
B118068
|
REO Broadcasting Consultants v. Martin
Appeal from Labor Commissioner's decision filed after 10-day time limit can't be heard regardless of excuse. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
B118042
|
Westamco Investment Company v. Lee
It's unnecessary to plead civil conspiracy before bringing malicious prosecution action against an attorney. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
D030531
|
Silver v. McNamee
Notice of intent to sue by service by mail is sufficient to invoke statutory provision tolling the suit's statute of limitations. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
D031744
|
Eckert v. The Superior Court of San Diego County (Tebo)
Once motions in limine are filed, trial has commenced and judge isn't required to stay trial pending disqualification motion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
95-55882
|
United States v. Puzo
Civil forfeiture of monies seized, after defendant pleaded to making false statements, isn't double jeopardy. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 26, 1999 | |
98-6315
|
Martin v. Punches
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 24, 1999 | |
A079373
|
Burlesci v. Petersen
In multiple tort action, nonsuit is proper only when there is insufficient evidence to support each allegation. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 24, 1999 | |
98-7027
|
Dry v. CFR Court of Indian Offenses for the Choctaw Nation
Defendant's satisfy requirements to seek habeas corpus relief by being charged and released pending trial. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-1285
|
Henderson v. Soares
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
98-3179
|
Olde Discount Corporation v. Hubbard
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 23, 1999 | |
B105789
|
Carlson v. State of California Department of Fish and Game
State law, not local rule, controls when determining effective filing date for complaint. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 21, 1999 | |
98-1322
|
Coleman v. Storage Technology Corporation
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 19, 1999 | |
97-55818
|
Prize Frize Inc. v. Matrix (U.S.) Inc.
Claims that aren't based on rights granted under U.S. patent laws aren't required to be heard in the Federal Circuit. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 18, 1999 |