For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Bass v. The County of Butte
California's Unruh Act and Disabled Persons Act do not incorporate Title I of ADA and cannot be used to enforce ADA's employment protections. 		Employment Law Oct. 19, 2006
Chuck v. Hewlett Packard Co.
Although plan did not meet notification and review requirements of ERISA, plaintiff's claim for benefits is still time-barred. 		Employment Law Oct. 18, 2006
Silver v. Executive Car Leasing Long-Term Disability Plan
Employee with serious heart condition demonstrated that he was continuously disabled and entitled to disability benefits. 		Employment Law Oct. 17, 2006
Singleton v. U.S. Gypsum Co.
Employer's summary judgment motion was improperly granted where determination of sexual harassment depends on resolution of material issues of fact. 		Employment Law Oct. 16, 2006
Smith v. Superior Court (L'Oreal USA Inc.)
Employer effectuates 'discharge' within meaning of Labor Code when it fires employee or when it releases employee upon completion of job assignment. 		Employment Law Oct. 16, 2006
Williams v. Genentech Inc.
Causes of action are not barred under exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine, but plaintiff still failed to establish disability-related claims. 		Employment Law Sep. 27, 2006
Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Under FEHA, employers have duty to provide reasonable accommodations to employees 'regarded as' disabled, even if not actually disabled. 		Employment Law Sep. 11, 2006
Stephens v. County of Tulare
Where county employee was not 'dismissed' from his employment, protections of Government Code Section 31725 were not triggered. 		Employment Law Sep. 7, 2006
Pitts v. City of Sacramento
Adverse ruling on employee's first petition for reinstatement to position did not preclude second petition where different rights were involved. 		Employment Law Aug. 30, 2006
Jenkins v. County of Riverside
In disability discrimination case, plaintiff was not entitled, as reasonable accommodation, to regular permanent position because she was only temporary employee. 		Employment Law Aug. 28, 2006
Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions
Writers' assistant on television show 'Friends' did not establish prima facie case of hostile workplace environment sexual harassment. 		Employment Law Aug. 28, 2006
Dark v. Curry County
ADA lawsuit was improperly dismissed where genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether disability was motivating factor for discharge. 		Employment Law Aug. 28, 2006
Smith v. Superior Court (L'Oreal USA Inc.)
Plaintiff hired for one day for flat fee cannot sue employer as 'discharged' employee. 		Employment Law Aug. 15, 2006
Miller v. Xerox Corp. Retirement Income Guarantee Plan
Xerox Corporation's method of accounting for prior distributions in calculating employees' final retirement benefits violates ERISA. 		Employment Law Jul. 11, 2006
Harman v. City and County of San Francisco
In employment discrimination case, plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to satisfy 'Monell' requirements. 		Employment Law Jul. 10, 2006
Stamps v. Superior Court (Kenny-Shea-Traylor-Frontier-Kemper, JV)
Civil Code's language and history do not convey legislative intent to exclude employment discrimination cases. 		Employment Law Jul. 10, 2006
Gober v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
Ratio of 6 to 1 of punitive to compensatory damages is constitutional maximum that can be awarded in sexual harassment case. 		Employment Law Jul. 10, 2006
Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co. Inc.
Casino's workplace appearance policy requiring women to wear makeup and style their hair does not constitute Title VII sex discrimination. 		Employment Law Jul. 6, 2006
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
Employee who demonstrated employer's actions were materially adverse to reasonable employee was entitled to damages under anti-retaliation provision of Civil Rights Act. 		Employment Law Jun. 28, 2006
Josephs v. Pacific Bell
Discriminatory refusal to reinstate is separately actionable claim. 		Employment Law Jun. 27, 2006
Cornwell v. Electra Central Credit Union
Employee raised triable issue of fact to defeat summary judgment regarding demotion but not regarding subsequent termination. 		Employment Law Jun. 26, 2006
Carter v. California Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Employer is not liable for sexual harassment perpetrated by client or customer under Fair Employment and Housing Act. 		Employment Law Jun. 20, 2006
Carter v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Employer is not liable for sexual harassment perpetrated by client or customer under Fair Employment and Housing Act. 		Employment Law Jun. 20, 2006
Whitman v. Dept. of Transportation
Court lacks jurisdiction to hear complaint of federal aviation employee alleging unlawful drug testing. 		Employment Law Jun. 19, 2006
Stephens v. County of Tulare
Plaintiff who was dismissed from employment due to work-related disability is entitled to back pay upon reinstatement. 		Employment Law Jun. 19, 2006
Empire Healthchoice Assurance Inc. v. McVeigh
Health plan administrator seeking reimbursement from beneficiary who recovered damages in state court tort action may not do so in federal court. 		Employment Law Jun. 16, 2006
U.S. v. Novak
Garnishment of pension plan funds pursuant to Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is not barred by ERISA anti-alienation provision. 		Employment Law Jun. 14, 2006
Mills v. Superior Court (Bed, Bath & Beyond Inc.)
Payment mandated by Labor Code Section 226.7 for employer's failure to provide meal or rest periods is penalty not wage. 		Employment Law Jun. 6, 2006
Overton v. Walt Disney Co.
Employer was not required to compensate employees for travel time where use of parking lot shuttle bus was not mandatory. 		Employment Law May 24, 2006
Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions
'Creative necessity' is not affirmative defense for sexual harassment that allegedly occurred on 'Friends' show. 		Employment Law May 23, 2006
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.