This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Roe v. State Personnel Board (Dept. of Justice)
Due to procedurally improper termination, plaintiff is entitled to backpay from Department of Justice.
Employment Law Aug. 23, 2004
Enlow v. Salem-Keizer Yellow Cab Co. Inc.
Cab company presents sufficient evidence that discharge of elderly employee was without discriminatory intent.
Employment Law Aug. 23, 2004
Sinatra v. Chico Unified School District
Program allowing educators to work part time rather than retire does not constitute fundamental and substantial public policy.
Employment Law Aug. 23, 2004
Hope International University v. Superior Court (Rouanzoin)
Christian university is not entitled to summary judgment on basis of 'ministerial exception' after termination of employees.
Employment Law Aug. 23, 2004
Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Massie
By failing to reach issue of unconscionability, court could not address arbitrability issue of defendant's claim.
Employment Law Aug. 16, 2004
Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Massie
By failing to reach issue of unconscionability, court could not address arbitrability issue of defendant's claim.
Employment Law Aug. 12, 2004
Hernandez v. Hughes Missile Systems Co.
Terminated employee with drug and alcohol problem who was not rehired may sue under Americans with Disabilities Act.
Employment Law Aug. 10, 2004
Salazar v. Diversified Paratransit Inc.
Employer may be liable under Fair Employment and Housing Act for sexual harassment committed by clients.
Employment Law Aug. 8, 2004
Franzosi v. Santa Monica Community College District
Tenured college instructor had 39 months from effective date of disability retirement to seek reinstatement.
Employment Law Jul. 29, 2004
Dept. of Health Services v. Superior Court (McGinnis)
Employer is strictly liable for hostile environment sexual harassment by supervisor under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act.
Employment Law Jul. 28, 2004
Schifando v. City of Los Angeles
City employee claiming discrimination under FEHA need not exhaust exhaust administrative remedies under city charter.
Employment Law Jul. 28, 2004
Salus v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Association
Sick leave payments are not final compensation required in calculating appellants' retirement benefits.
Employment Law Jul. 28, 2004
Vernon v. State of California
State is not liable for policy that prohibited African-American firefighter from working because of facial hair.
Employment Law Jul. 26, 2004
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. Superior Court (Cargill)
Public Employees' Retirement Law requires contracting public agencies to enroll common law employees in state's public employees' retirement program.
Employment Law Jul. 26, 2004
Mathieu v. Norrell Corp.
Temporary employment agency may be liable for retaliation against worker who complained of sexual harassment while on assignment.
Employment Law Jul. 25, 2004
Sampson v. Parking Service 2000 Com Inc.
Section 1194 of Labor Code does not apply to administrative proceedings before commissioner to recover overtime compensation.
Employment Law Jul. 25, 2004
Bell v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Judgment for unpaid double-time hours worked is reversed for want of reliability in method of calculation.
Employment Law Jul. 23, 2004
Espinoza v. Classic Pizza Inc.
Court improperly calculated employee's rate of pay in determining amount of overtime owed by employer.
Employment Law Jul. 22, 2004
Mason v. Lake Dolores Group
Plaintiff's negligence action against employer was not barred by workers' compensation exclusive remedy rule.
Employment Law Jul. 22, 2004
Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan
ERISA administrator did not err in rejecting defendant's disability claim when evidence was unconvincing.
Employment Law Jul. 21, 2004
Ballaris v. Wacker Siltronic Corp.
Time spent by employees changing plant uniforms is 'work time' under Fair Labor Standards Act.
Employment Law Jul. 21, 2004
Fine v. L.A. Unified School District
Law does not require school district to classify teacher as probationary retroactive to validity of teaching credential.
Employment Law Jul. 19, 2004
Bodett v. CoxCom Inc.
Employee who was terminated for harassing gay subordinate failed to establish claim of religious discrimination.
Employment Law Jul. 9, 2004
City of Anaheim v. Nolan
Police officer's inability to get along with colleagues does not incapacitate him to work elsewhere within state.
Employment Law Jun. 30, 2004
Allen v. Pacific Bell
Because former disabled employee did not cooperate in job search process, employer did not fail to fulfill its duty to consider alternative job.
Employment Law Jun. 30, 2004
Nedra Johnson v. W.L. Gore & Assoc.
Employers elapsed-time regulation did not violate ERISA's vesting and benefit accrual requirements.
Employment Law Jun. 29, 2004
Snyder v. Navajo Nation
Fair Labor Standards Act does not apply to tribal law enforcement officers' overtime dispute.
Employment Law Jun. 21, 2004
Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
Employer may raise affirmative defense in claim of constructive discharge where no employer-sanctioned adverse action occurred.
Employment Law Jun. 21, 2004
Mathews v. Chevron Corp.
Employer actively misinformed availability of benefits to employees prior to their retirement.
Employment Law May 25, 2004
Chapman v. Enos
Court erred in instructing jury that supervisor must be fully accountable and responsible for employee's performance and work product.
Employment Law May 21, 2004