Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01-16922
|
Shaver v. Operating Engineers Local 428 Pension Trust Fund
Because financial records sought were not instruments under which pension plan was established or operated, trustees had no duty to disclose. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 3, 2003 | |
01-16596
|
Honolulu Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of United Assn. Local Union No. 675 v. Foster
Legal restitution is not available as appropriate equitable relief under ERISA; denial of attorney fees is not abuse of discretion. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 3, 2003 | |
02-35235
|
Pottenger v. Potlatch Corp.
Employee, who worked for corporation for 32 years, failed to establish he was terminated in violation of Age Discrimination in Employment Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 23, 2003 | |
01-35254
|
Cherosky v. Henderson
Employee is barred from challenging discriminatory decision made outside limitations period under 'continuing violation' doctrine. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 22, 2003 | |
00-36060
|
Ostad v. Oregon Health Sciences University
Jury verdict in favor of medical resident who was terminated after questioning billing practices is affirmed. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
03-301
|
Opinion of Lockyer
Person employed as trainee by fire department to provide firefighting services is entitled to enhanced benefits granted by Workers' Compensation Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 23, 2003 | |
00-35589
|
Hobler v. Brueher
Elected county prosecutor may dismiss at-will confidential secretaries hired by predecessor he defeated. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
02-35198
|
Moe v. United States
Federal employee's psychological injury that led to physical injury is covered by Federal Employee's Compensation Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
B139304
|
Wittkopf v. County of Los Angeles
Under Fair Employment and Housing Act, plaintiff alleging disability discrimination is not required to show 'substantial' limitation of major life activity. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
01-56725
|
Gradilla v. Ruskin Manufacturing
Employee is not entitled to leave under state law to care for ailing family member who travels for reasons unrelated to treatment. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 15, 2003 | |
99-15645
|
Costa v. Desert Palace Inc.
Title VII does not impose special or heightened evidentiary burden on plaintiff in 'mixed-motive' case during trial. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 10, 2003 | |
01-1368
|
Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs
State employer may be liable for money damages for interfering with employee's FMLA rights. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 3, 2003 | |
02-469
|
Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord
ERISA plan administrator is not required to defer to opinion of treating physician in making benefits determination. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 3, 2003 | |
01-57184
|
Winterrowd v. American General Annuity Insurance Co.
Insurance company failed to offer severance benefits pursuant to ERISA 'employee benefit plan.' |
Employment Law |
|
May 30, 2003 | |
01-17316
|
Oracle Corp. v. Falotti
Employee was not entitled to stock options or stock-options damages after being terminated without cause. |
Employment Law |
|
May 29, 2003 | |
C039896
|
Stevens v. Dept. of Corrections
Employer who refused request for vacation time over Christmas holiday is not liable under family leave law. |
Employment Law |
|
May 28, 2003 | |
00-55689
|
Nord v. Black & Decker Disability Plan
Injured employee who physicians determined could only sit for one hour and lift five pounds is entitled to disability benefits under ERISA. |
Employment Law |
|
May 27, 2003 | |
99-16321
|
Hibbs v. Department of Human Resources
Court errs in concluding that Family Medical Leave Act doesn't contain sufficiently clear expression of congressional intent to abrogate Eleventh Amendment immunity. |
Employment Law |
|
May 26, 2003 | |
01-1435
|
Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates v. Wells
Court must determine whether shareholder-directors of professional corporation are 'employees' under ADA. |
Employment Law |
|
May 2, 2003 | |
00-35545
|
Wells v. Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates P.C.
Physician shareholders are employees of corporation, not partners, therefore, corporation is employer and covered entity for purposes of American With Disabilities Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 23, 2003 | |
B158514
|
Cedillo v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Worker injured on roof while working for uninsured contractor is not employee of homeowner. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 15, 2003 | |
00-35999
|
Raad v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School District
Plaintiff raised genuine issues of material fact regarding workplace discrimination due to her national origin and religion. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 9, 2003 | |
A091221
|
Walia v. Aetna
Wrongful termination found when employer terminated employee after she refused to sign non-compete agreement. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 9, 2003 | |
B142962
|
Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club Inc.
Definition of disability enacted in 2000 doesn't apply retroactively to disability discrimination case brought in 1997. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 8, 2003 | |
B147003
|
Little v. Auto Stiegler Inc.
Arbitration agreement is enforceable under 'Armendariz' because employee's complaint did not invoke statutory claims. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 8, 2003 | |
02-15393
|
Dyack v. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
Physician was not member of civil service and thus not entitled to notice of termination or opportunity to respond. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 24, 2003 | |
B154863
|
Shafer v. County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Dept.
Police officer's false statements during worker's compensation deposition were admissible in termination hearing. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 18, 2003 | |
H023698
|
Cucuzza v. City of Santa Clara
City's alleged conduct under Fair Employment and Housing Act did not amount to 'continuing violation.' |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 28, 2003 | |
C034625
|
Rieger v. Arnold
In sexual harassment action, employee's prior sexual conduct at workplace is admissible. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 20, 2003 | |
01-15287
|
Rudebusch v. Hughes
Pay adjustments awarded to minorities and women raise factual issues as to whether they were remedial. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 18, 2003 |