For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
United States v. CB & I Constructors Inc.
In case of negligently set fire, federal government can recover intangible environmental damages because nothing in California law prevents such recovery. 		Environmental Law Jul. 2, 2012
W.M. Barr & Co. Inc. v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
Labeling requirement is not preempted by Federal Hazardous Substances Act because hangtag does not constitute directions for use under federal labeling requirements. 		Environmental Law Jun. 29, 2012
City of Hayward v. Board of Trustees of the California State University
Environmental impact report for master plan to expand university's physical capacity is generally adequate, but fails to meaningfully analyze impact on neighboring parkland. 		Environmental Law Jun. 29, 2012
Snoqualmie Valley Preservation Alliance v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers does not violate Clean Water Act by authorizing hydropower project under nationwide permits rather than requiring individual permit. 		Environmental Law Jun. 27, 2012
Outfitter Properties LLC v. Wildlife Conservation Board (Dept. of Fish and Game)
Wildlife Conservation Board has limited discretion to expend money from Habitat Conservation Fund because expenditure of 'approximately' $6 million is authorized. 		Environmental Law Jun. 27, 2012
American Coatings Association Inc. v. South Coast Air Quality District
District may create environmental standards based on technologies that do not exist but are reasonably anticipated to exist by compliance deadline. 		Environmental Law Jun. 26, 2012
Pacific Rivers Council v. United States Forest Service
U.S. Forest Service fails to take requisite 'hard look' at environmental consequences of changes to Sierra Nevada Forest Plan with respect to fish species. 		Environmental Law Jun. 20, 2012
Association of Irritated Residents v. California Air Resources Board
California Air Resources Board's scoping plan does not violate Global Warming Solutions Act because there was ample support for recommendations on which Board settled. 		Environmental Law Jun. 19, 2012
Tomlinson v. County of Alameda (Wong)
Exhaustion-of-remedies provision applies to public agency’s determination that project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act requirements. 		Environmental Law Jun. 14, 2012
Van de Kamps Coalition v. Board of Trustees of Los Angeles Community College District (City of Los Angeles)
Board's approvals made subsequent to creation of project do not trigger new statute of limitations period where project was not substantially changed. 		Environmental Law Jun. 5, 2012
Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service
Agency's approval of notices of intent to conduct recreational mining in river violates Endangered Species Act because agency did not consult with relevant wildlife agencies. 		Environmental Law Jun. 3, 2012
Native Village of Point Hope v. Salazar
Challenge to oil company’s exploration plan for developing oil and gas reserves is moot because plan referenced oil spill response plan, which was later approved. 		Environmental Law May 29, 2012
Consolidated Irrigation District v. Superior Court (City of Selma)
Motion to augment record should have been granted because including tape recordings of meetings with no transcripts best promotes purposes of accountability and informed self-government. 		Environmental Law May 24, 2012
Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. County of Marin
Tolling agreements extending period for filing complaint challenging environmental impact report are effective because of strong public policy to encourage settlement of controversies. 		Environmental Law May 13, 2012
Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority)
Use of projected future conditions to determine environmental impact of light rail construction is appropriate where impact on presently existing conditions would yield no practical information. 		Environmental Law May 11, 2012
Consolidated Irrigation District v. Superior Court (City of Selma)
Motion to augment record should have been granted because including tape recordings of meetings with no transcripts best promotes purposes of accountability and informed self-government. 		Environmental Law Apr. 26, 2012
Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation District
Irrigation district is not required to prepare environmental impact report in adopting regulations implementing plan for distribution of water in event of water shortage. 		Environmental Law Apr. 26, 2012
Western Watersheds Project v. United States Dept. of the Interior
Under Equal Access to Justice Act, plaintiff is not entitled to attorney fees for work performed in pre-litigation administrative grazing-permit proceedings. 		Environmental Law Apr. 25, 2012
Sierra Club v. Napa County Board of Supevisors
Lot line adjustment ordinance is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act's purview because procedure for approval of adjustments involved only ministerial acts. 		Environmental Law Apr. 22, 2012
Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. County of Marin
Tolling agreements extending period for filing complaint challenging environmental impact report are effective because of strong public policy to encourage settlement of controversies. 		Environmental Law Apr. 22, 2012
Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority)
Use of projected future conditions to determine environmental impact of light rail construction is appropriate where impact on presently existing conditions would yield no practical information. 		Environmental Law Apr. 17, 2012
Sackett v. EPA
Property owners may bring civil action pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act to challenge issuance of compliance order by EPA under Clean Water Act. 		Environmental Law Mar. 21, 2012
No Wetlands Landfill Expansion v. County of Marin (Redwood Landfill Inc.)
County board of supervisors has no power to hear appeal regarding solid waste facilities permit where it is not decisionmaking body of local enforcement agency. 		Environmental Law Mar. 20, 2012
Turtle Island Restoration Network v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce
Consent decree between environmental groups and federal agencies regarding fishery management does not violate federal law because law does not impede parties’ ability to settle. 		Environmental Law Mar. 14, 2012
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Salazar
Statute calling for removal of distinct population of gray wolves from Endangered Species Act protections, without regard to any statute, must be enforced. 		Environmental Law Mar. 14, 2012
Consolidated Irrigation District v. City of Selma (Raven)
In CEQA proceeding, court's decision to augment record is proper under substantial evidence test even if declaration supporting documents is contradicted. 		Environmental Law Mar. 11, 2012
Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley (Logan)
Proposed construction of dwelling does not qualify for categorical exemption from California Environmental Quality Act because its size creates 'unusual circumstances.' 		Environmental Law Mar. 8, 2012
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States
U.S. Dept. of Interior’s exercise of discretion in treating water releases from central valley reservoirs as ‘non-fishery actions’ is proper. 		Environmental Law Mar. 4, 2012
Alameda County Flood Control v. Dept. of Water Resources
Contractors unsucessfully challenge Dept. of Water Resources' method of crediting water recipients with revenues from Oroville Dam hydropower. 		Environmental Law Feb. 21, 2012
Turtle Island Restoration Network v. United States Dept. of State
Res judicata bars environmental group’s challenge to certification process involving countries exempted from general ban on shrimp imports. 		Environmental Law Feb. 21, 2012
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.