Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
05-75376
|
Moreno-Morante v. Gonzales
Petitioner's grandchildren do not satisfy statutory definition of 'child' for purposes of cancellation of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 24, 2007 | |
05-70298
|
Goel v. Gonzales
Polygraph evidence which could have been obtained prior to hearing does not provide adequate basis for motion to reopen. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 22, 2007 | |
05-75376
|
Moreno-Morante v. Gonzales
Petitioner's grandchildren do not satisfy statutory definition of 'child' for purposes of cancellation of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 22, 2007 | |
05-71803
|
Reynoso-Cisneros v. Gonzales
Board of Immigration Appeals errs in determining it lacked jurisdiction over deportee's motion to reopen exclusion proceedings. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 15, 2007 | |
03-74390
|
Singh v. Gonzales
Immigration judge errs in using inference alone to deny asylum to Sikh citizen of India who claimed to have suffered political persecution. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 15, 2007 | |
05-71803
|
Reynoso-Cisneros v. Gonzales
Board of Immigration Appeals errs in determining it lacked jurisdiction over deportee's motion to reopen exclusion proceedings. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 14, 2007 | |
03-74390
|
Singh v. Gonzales
Immigration judge errs in using inference alone to deny asylum to Sikh citizen of India who claimed to have suffered political persecution. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 14, 2007 | |
06-55774
|
Abdala v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Somali's habeas petition challenging length but not lawfulness of pre-deportation detainment is rendered moot by his removal from United States. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 8, 2007 | |
05-50501
|
U.S. v. Narvaez-Gomez
Conviction for illegal entry after removal affirmed where agents do not employ two-step interrogation to elicit admission of former deportation. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 8, 2007 | |
06-55774
|
Abdala v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Somali's habeas petition challenging length but not lawfulness of pre-deportation detainment is rendered moot by his removal from United States. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 8, 2007 | |
05-50501
|
U.S. v. Narvaez-Gomez
Conviction for illegal entry after removal affirmed where agents do not employ two-step interrogation to elicit admission of former deportation. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 8, 2007 | |
04-70804
|
Tang v. Gonzales
Woman who underwent forced abortion in China is found to be eligible for asylum and is statutorily entitled to withholding of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 8, 2007 | |
04-70804
|
Tang v. Gonzales
Woman who underwent forced abortion in China is found to be eligible for asylum and is statutorily entitled to withholding of removal. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 7, 2007 | |
04-70765
|
Landin-Zavala v. Gonzales
Application for cancellation of removal is properly denied where continuous physical presence does not accrue after formal exclusion order. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 5, 2007 | |
04-71335
|
Kharana v. Gonzales
Lawful U.S. permanent resident's offense of fraudulently appropriating more than $10,000, qualifies as aggravated felony under INA. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 5, 2007 | |
03-74661
|
Covarrubias v. Gonzales
Asylum petitioner who admitted to helping brother unlawfully enter United States is barred from showing good moral character in deportation proceeding. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 5, 2007 | |
03-74661
|
Covarrubias v. Gonzales
Asylum petitioner who admitted to helping brother unlawfully enter United States is barred from showing good moral character in deportation proceeding. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 5, 2007 | |
04-70765
|
Landin-Zavala v. Gonzales
Application for cancellation of removal is properly denied where continuous physical presence does not accrue after formal exclusion order. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 4, 2007 | |
04-71335
|
Kharana v. Gonzales
Lawful U.S. permanent resident's offense of fraudulently appropriating more than $10,000, qualifies as aggravated felony under INA. |
Immigration |
|
Jun. 4, 2007 | |
03-74625
|
Garcia-Jimenez v. Gonzales
Petitioner is barred from obtaining cancellation of removal where he had received waiver of deportation as to his convictions. |
Immigration |
|
May 30, 2007 | |
03-74625
|
Garcia-Jimenez v. Gonzales
Petitioner is barred from obtaining cancellation of removal where he had received waiver of deportation as to his convictions. |
Immigration |
|
May 30, 2007 | |
05-73098
|
Saravia-Paguada v. Gonzalez
Immigration judge properly calculates time served based on sentence enhancement and substantive offense, in denying relief to Honduran national facing deportation. |
Immigration |
|
May 22, 2007 | |
H029324
|
People v. Kim
Felony theft conviction subjecting South Korean to deportation cannot be vacated based on mistake of law or ineffective assistance of counsel. |
Immigration |
|
May 18, 2007 | |
02-71966
|
Chaidez v. Gonzales
Deportation order is invalid where government fails to show that petitioner was properly served with Order to Show Cause. |
Immigration |
|
May 17, 2007 | |
05-76297
|
Montes-Lopez v. Gonzales
Board of Immigration Appeals erroneously disregards petitioner's claim that his right to counsel was violated by immigration judge. |
Immigration |
|
May 17, 2007 | |
03-74640
|
Pedroza-Padilla v. Gonzales
Waiver of inadmissibility under Immigration Reform and Control Act does not 'legalize' alien whose deportation interrupted continuous residence. |
Immigration |
|
May 15, 2007 | |
03-72384
|
Lolong v. Gonzales
Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction to review Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of asylum where Immigration Judge previously determined alien was removable. |
Immigration |
|
May 11, 2007 | |
05-72472
|
Juarez-Ramos v. Gonzales
Expedited removal order interrupts required continuous physical presence necessary to be eligible for cancellation of removal. |
Immigration |
|
May 11, 2007 | |
04-56353
|
Gallarde v. INS
Philippine national, who used alienage to seek early discharge from voluntary enlistment in U.S. Navy, is not barred from becoming U.S. citizen. |
Immigration |
|
May 11, 2007 | |
03-70674
|
Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales
Previously removed alien who re-enters country illegally is not entitled to hearing before immigration judge to determine whether to reinstate prior removal order. |
Immigration |
|
May 8, 2007 |