| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S063473
|
Walker v. 20th Century Insurance Co.
Convicted felon cannot recover attorney fees from insurer for breach of covenant of good faith. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 15, 1999 | |
|
A073106
|
Fitzpatrick v. Hayes
Insurance company has no duty to advise insureds about available personal umbrella coverage. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 15, 1999 | |
|
96-55839
|
Blue Ridge Insurance Co. v. Stanewich
Liability insurer limiting coverage to 'accidents' needn't defend claim based on insured's assault and attempted robbery. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 15, 1999 | |
|
A073106
|
Fitzpatrick v. Hayes
Insurance company has no duty to advise insureds about available personal umbrella coverage. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 14, 1999 | |
|
97-1442
|
Ward v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Whether insured reasonably relied on statements of insurer's adjuster is fact issue precluding summary judgment. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 14, 1999 | |
|
B091492
|
Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp v. Yosemite Insurance Co.
Insurer can unconditionally accept indemnity obligations to insured and still contend no coverage against other insurers. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 14, 1999 | |
|
A076654
|
Century Indemnity Co. v. Bank of America
Stay of action by insurers is warranted if parties involved in litigation in another state. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 14, 1999 | |
|
B109353
|
Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (Jensen-Kelly Corp.)
Insurer's second challenge to its duty to defend doesn't constitute an impermissible motion for reconsideration. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 14, 1999 | |
|
A075810
|
Havstad v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.
Insureds fail to rebut insurance company's showing of no coverage potential under title insurance policy. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 14, 1999 | |
|
S063425
|
Foster-Gardner Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburg, PA
Proceedings commenced by issuance of determination and order does constitute 'suit' in this case. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 14, 1999 | |
|
B107356
|
Mardirossian v. Superior Court (Farmers Insurance Group)
Policy's value protection provisions are incompatible with upgrade exclusions making policy ambiguous as matter of law. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 12, 1999 | |
|
S062614
|
Mardirossian v. Los Angeles County Superior Court (Farmer Insurance Group)
Policy's value protection provisions are incompatible with upgrade exclusions making policy ambiguous as matter of law. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 12, 1999 | |
|
B104666
|
Quackenbush v. Superior Court (Lyons)
Commissioner needn't warn public nor bar underwritten title company from doing business after code violations. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 12, 1999 | |
|
A072693
|
The Economic Empowerment Foundation v. Quackenbush (Farmers Insurance Group of Companies)
Group which challenged insurer's rate increase request must exhaust administrative remedies before fee can be awarded. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 12, 1999 | |
|
B104163
|
A-H Plating Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.
Insurer's failure to defend company for groundwater contamination is error since no evidence policy exclusion applies. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 11, 1999 | |
|
S054826
|
USAA v. Superior Court (Riley)
Consolidation of personal injury claim and action for spoliation of evidence doesn't prejudice insurance company. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
B102978
|
Mercury Casualty Co. v. Hertz Corp.
Rental car driver's insurance company is primary insurer over rental company in accident with third party. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
96-35806
|
Perry v. Harco National Insurance Co.
Agency-required MCS-90 liability insurance endorsement for motor carriers isn't extended to independent contractor's negligence. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
A076034
|
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of San Francisco v. Workman's Auto Insurance Co.
Rental car company can avoid primary liability insurance responsibility with cash deposit and rental agreement disclaimer. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 9, 1999 | |
|
B100535
|
J.B. Aguerre Inc. v. American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Co.
Lack of evidence showing insurer acted unreasonably in defending insured requires dismissal of bad faith claim. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 9, 1999 | |
|
B105818
|
Unetco Industries Exchange v. Homestead Insurance Co.
Insurer is entitled to appraisal of both replacement cost and amount of loss under earthquake policy. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 9, 1999 | |
|
B105818
|
Unetco Industries Exchange v. Homestead Insurance Company
Insurer is entitled to appraisal of both replacement cost and amount of loss under earthquake policy. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 9, 1999 | |
|
96-16507
|
Reese v. The Travelers Insurance Co.
Despite asserting no possible liability for insured's pollution, insurer must defend under coverage for false claims. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 9, 1999 | |
|
S065447
|
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Los Angeles County Superior Court (Vickers, Inc.)
Insurer's duty to defend against any 'suit' doesn' t include duty to defend against administrative claim. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
S065447
|
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (Vickers, Inc.)
Insurer's duty to defend against any 'suit' doesn't include duty to defend against administrative claim. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
H015142 and H015728
|
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.
Insurer of school district doesn't have duty to defend teacher accused of sexually molesting students. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
96-35713
|
Enron Oil Trading & Transportation Co. v. Walbrook Insurance Co. Ltd.
Pollution exclusion doesn't apply to losses from addition of foreign substance to crude oil through pipeline. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
H015142 and H015728
|
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Century Indemnity Company
Insurer of school district doesn't have duty to defend teacher accused of sexually molesting students. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
B103415
|
Doheny West Homeowners' Assoc. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
Scope of collapse coverage in property insurance policy extends to both actual and imminent collapse. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 | |
|
A078530
|
Quackenbush v. Superior Court (Congress of California Seniors)
Injunction against expenditure of state funds to implement Proposition 213, restricting damage recovery, is invalid. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 7, 1999 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com