Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-35845
|
Talking Rain Beverage Co. Inc. v. South Beach Beverage Co.
Because bottle's design is functional, trademark is invalid. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 12, 2003 | |
02-57011
|
Elvis Presley Enterprises Inc. v. Passport Video
Video biography of Elvis Presley did not make 'fair use' of copyrighted materials. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 6, 2003 | |
B145831
|
Sargent Fletcher Inc. Able Corp.
Aerospace manufacturer has burden of proof showing that subcontractor improperly used its trade secret. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 28, 2003 | |
01-56733
|
Horphag Research Ltd. v. Pellegrini
Defendant who repeatedly used trademark on Website is liable for infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 15, 2003 | |
02-55667
|
Scholastic Entertainment Inc. v. Fox Entertainment Group Inc.
Dispute over ownership of copyright that presents question of contract law is governed by state law; federal subject matter jurisdiction is lacking. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 14, 2003 | |
S102588
|
DVD Copy Control Assn. Inc. v. Bunner
Trial court may issue preliminary injunction prohibiting Web site operator from disclosing trade secrets. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 13, 2003 | |
00-55521
|
Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.
Defendant's creation and use of 'thumbnails' of plaintiff's photographs in its Internet search engine are fair use. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 10, 2003 | |
02-56956
|
Los Angeles News Service v. Reuters Television International Limited
News organization may not recover actual damages under Copyright Act for acts of infringement that mostly occur outside United States. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 9, 2003 | |
S098266
|
Cadence Design Systems Inc. v. Avant! Corporation
Initial action alleging trade secret misappropriation precludes subsequent claims of improper use because first suit includes 'continuing misappropriation.' |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 1, 2003 | |
01-56582
|
Rice v. Fox Broadcasting Co.
False advertising that does not influence potential consumers' purchasing decisions, means deception is immaterial and therefore not actionable under the Lanham Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 22, 2003 | |
01-56069
|
Silvers v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.
Accrued cause of action for copyright infringement may be assigned to third party. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 22, 2003 | |
02-0704
|
Yellow Cab Co. of Sacramento v. Yellow Cab Co. of Elk Grove
Plaintiff's trademark infringement suit fails because term 'yellow cab' is generic. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 7, 2003 | |
02-428
|
Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Lanham Act does not prohibit unaccredited copying of uncopyrighted work. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 10, 2003 | |
01-57107
|
Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide Inc.
Plaintiff has no standing to sue for copyright infringement because plaintiff's musical compositions were created as works for hire. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-56055
|
KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v Lasting Impression I, Inc.
In trademark action between make-up manufacturers, court erred in finding that term 'micro colors' was generic and descriptive. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 30, 2003 | |
02-16347
|
Satava v. Lowry
Glass jellyfish sculptures lack originality needed to merit copyright protection. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 1, 2003 | |
01-17411
|
Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc.
Allegedly infringing photographs are not virtually identical as required by defensive doctrines of merger and scenes a faire. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Mar. 26, 2003 | |
01-57095
|
Brother Records Inc. v. Jardine
Former band member infringed trademark by touring with new band under modified version of old band name. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Mar. 24, 2003 | |
01-1015
|
Moseley v. Secret Catalogue Inc.
Claim for trademark dilution requires proof of actual harm to mark's distinctive quality. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Mar. 11, 2003 | |
01-618
|
Eldred v. Ashcroft
Copyright Term Extension Act does not exceed Congress' power under the copyright clause. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 22, 2003 | |
00-56470
|
Los Angeles News Service v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.
Court TV's use of clips from copyrighted video 'Beating of Reginald Denny' is protected fair use. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 | |
G028382
|
Schlage Lock Co. v. Whyte
Doctrine of inevitable disclosure is contrary to California law and policy because it creates after-fact covenant not to compete, restricting employee mobility. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 10, 2002 | |
01-35155
|
Interstellar Starship Services Limited v. Tchou
Court's decision to allow owner of infringing domain name to retain ownership interest in the name was proper. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 10, 2002 | |
01-6049
|
Sally Beauty Co. Inc. v. Beautyco Inc.
Plaintiffs established genuine issue of material fact of likelihood of confusion between two hair care products. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 6, 2002 | |
00-35815
|
Tie Tech Inc. v. Kinedyne Corp.
Summary judgment is proper against trademark holder because product design of device is not fanciful, but instead wholly functional. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
00-35839
|
Mackie v. Rieser
Artist cannot recover damages when he fails to show copyright infringement caused indirect profits. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
00-56192
|
Cavalier v. Random House Inc.
Alleged copyrighted literary works fail 'substantially similar' analysis while artwork infringement claims presents triable issues of fact. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 26, 2002 | |
01-55811
|
Metcalf v. Bocho
'Common patterns' found throughout storylines may warrant a finding of substantial similarity under the Copyright Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 10, 2002 | |
00-55293
|
Thane International Inc. v. Trek Bicycle Corp.
Court erred in granting summary judgment in trademark case where reasonable jury could decide likelihood of confusion issue in favor of either party. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 8, 2002 | |
98-56453
|
Mattel Inc. v. MCA Records Inc.
Song titled 'Barbie Girl' has artistic relevance and is not misleading, thus RCA did not infringe on Mattel's trademark. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 29, 2002 |