Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09-56317
|
Fleischer Studios Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A. Inc.
Plaintiff’s claim for copyright infringement fails when transfer specifically carved out copyright to character, breaking chain of title. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 24, 2011 | |
10-35388
|
Lahoti v. Vericheck Inc.
Court properly determines trademark is suggestive on remand, after finding mark did not immediately convey information about nature of services offered by trademark holder. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 17, 2011 | |
09-16322
|
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.
Court errs in using ‘identical or nearly identical’ standard to determine dilution claim following enactment of Trademark Dilution Revision Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 9, 2011 | |
09-56499
|
United Fabrics International Inc. v. C&J Wear Inc.
Validity of copyright is presumed after copyright registration and court errs in dismissing case for lack of standing absent some evidence rebutting presumption. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 27, 2011 | |
08-55998
|
UMG Recordings Inc. v. Augusto
Unsolicited distribution of copyrighted CDs without restrictions on disposal or use does not create licensing agreement, and is subject to first sale doctrine. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 4, 2011 | |
08-16382
|
FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network
Nonprofit corporation engages in 'naked licensing' by failing to exercise control over licensee and thus, abandons its trademarks. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 25, 2010 | |
08-55062
|
DSPT International Inc. v. Nahum
Defendant may be liable for cybersquatting where he uses trademarked domain name in bad faith for leverage against plaintiff. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 27, 2010 | |
09-55673
|
MGA Entertainment Inc. v. Mattel Inc.
Constructive trust transferring Bratz trademark portfolio to Mattel Inc. is improper where defendant's legitimate efforts increased value of Bratz brand. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 21, 2010 | |
09-35969
|
Vernor v. Autodesk Inc.
Licensee cannot convey ownership of software to buyer, and buyer cannot in turn sell software, claiming protection under ‘first sale doctrine.’ |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 13, 2010 | |
08-56791
|
Seller Agency Council Inc. v. Kennedy Center for Real Estate Education Inc.
Finding of unclean hands for conduct taken before alleged trademark infringement action does not bar defendant from asserting equitable defense. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 7, 2010 | |
09-55817
|
F.B.T. Productions LLC v. Aftermath Records
Contracts unambiguously state that company is entitled to 50 percent of royalties on sales of Eminem's recordings in form of downloads and mastertones. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 7, 2010 | |
H033631
|
Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp.
Unjust enrichment is not provable where jury finds defendant has not made profit from trade secret misappropriation. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 31, 2010 | |
08-56291
|
Fortune Dynamic Inc. v. Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management Inc.
Summary judgment is improper in trademark infringement case where use of descriptive term created issue of material fact as to fair use. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 20, 2010 | |
08-55075
|
Jules Jordan Video Inc. v. 144942 Canada Inc.
Films are not ‘works for hire’ where employee preparing work is sole officer and shareholder of employer company and responsible for all decisions. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 17, 2010 | |
10-55069
|
Advertise.com Inc. v. AOL Advertising Inc.
Preliminary injunction is inappropriate where term ADVERTISING.COM is generic because 'dot-com' can refer generally to Internet-based businesses. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 4, 2010 | |
09-55673
|
MGA Entertainment Inc. v. Mattel Inc.
Constructive trust transferring Bratz trademark portfolio to Mattel Inc. is improper where defendant's legitimate efforts increased value of Bratz brand. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 23, 2010 | |
07-55344
|
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. v. Tabari
Domain names may contain trademark where such use does not create confusion that website is sponsored or endorsed by trademark holder. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 9, 2010 | |
09-55134
|
Mindys Cosmetics Inc. v. Dakar
Court denies attorney's anti-SLAPP motion although lawsuit arose from protected act of filing trademark application with U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 7, 2010 | |
08-964
|
Bilski v. Kappos
Machine-or-transformation test is not sole test for determining patent eligibility of 'process' under Section 101 of Patent Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 29, 2010 | |
08-15206
|
Visa International Service Association v. JSL Corp.
Company may not use mark where online use of mark could weaken ability of consumers to associate plaintiff's mark with Visa brand. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 29, 2010 | |
08-55719
|
Benay v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Copyrighted ‘Last Samurai’ screenplay is not infringed by ‘Last Samurai’ film, despite similarities. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 10, 2010 | |
08-56954
|
Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television Inc.
Federal copyright law preempts state claims where plaintiffs’ asserted state rights are equivalent to rights of copyright owners. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 4, 2010 | |
07-15383
|
Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon
Venue is proper where defendant infringed copyright using website targeting prospective clients in jurisdiction where plaintiff’s business operates. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 1, 2010 | |
H032895
|
Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.
Purchaser of misappropriated source code is not liable for misappropriation of trade secrets by executing machine-readable code translated from source code. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 28, 2010 | |
08-56079
|
Cosmetic Ideas Inc. v. IAC/InteractiveCorp
Plaintiff complies with registration requirement by submitting completed application to Copyright Office prior to filing infringement suit. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 26, 2010 | |
08-16005
|
Au-Tomotive Gold Inc. v. Volkswagen of America Inc.
Company is liable for trademark infringement where it sells purchased item with trademark symbol, creating post-purchase confusion as to item’s origin. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 7, 2010 | |
B190482
|
Franklin Mint Co. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP
Estate and Fund associated with Princess Diana lacked probable cause to prosecute trademark dilution claim against company selling merchandise with her likeness. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 5, 2010 | |
H032895
|
Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.
Purchaser of misappropriated source code is not liable for misappropriation of trade secrets by executing machine-readable code translated from source code. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 30, 2010 | |
08-56831
|
Zobmondo Entertainment LLC v. Falls Media LLC
Summary judgment is improper where genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether board game trademark is invalid as descriptive mark. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 27, 2010 | |
08-17306
|
CRS Recovery Inc. v. Laxton
California law applies to diversity case involving dispute over ownership of Internet domain name where California defendant's tortious conduct occurred in California. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 7, 2010 |