Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06-55221
|
Sybersound Records Inc. v. UAV Corp.
Party who lacked standing to bring copyright infringement suit under Copyright Act cannot bring claim under Lanham Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 28, 2008 | |
B187661
|
CytoDyn Inc. v. Amerimmune Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Statutory award of attorney fees under Uniform Trade Secrets Act is improper in action for alleged misappropriation of patents and trademarks. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 21, 2008 | |
05-55627
|
Jada Toys Inc. v. Mattel Inc.
In trademark infringement case, district court errs by only considering one ‘Sleekcraft’ factor in its likelihood of confusion analysis. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 21, 2008 | |
06-55102
|
Leadsinger Inc. v. BMG Music Publishing
Mechanical license acquired under Copyright Act will not authorize karaoke company’s utilization of copyrighted materials because its device is audiovisual work, not phonorecord. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 3, 2008 | |
05-56123
|
Applied Information Sciences Corp. v. eBay Inc.
eBay is entitled to summary judgment where 'SmartSearch' owner shows protectable interest in trademark but produces no admissible evidence of confusion. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Dec. 31, 2007 | |
06-55393
|
K&N Engineering Inc. v. Bulat
Election of statutory damages under 15 U.S.C. Section 1117(c) for trademark counterfeiting claim precludes award of attorney fees under Section 1117(b). |
Intellectual Property |
|
Dec. 19, 2007 | |
06-55405
|
Perfect 10 Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.
Google thumbnails do not infringe Perfect 10's exclusive rights to copyrighted photographs of nude models. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Dec. 4, 2007 | |
05-56794
|
Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc.
Court properly enjoins internet based company from using infringing marks where likelihood of consumer confusion exists. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 5, 2007 | |
05-56047
|
Rhoades v. Avon Products Inc.
Case is improperly dismissed where plaintiff's claim that beauty product company threatened trademark infringement suit alleges true case or controversy. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
06-16219
|
Freecycle Network Inc. v. Oey
Statements encouraging use of 'freecycle' to keep term in public domain does not constitute contributory trademark infringement or disparagement under Lanham Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 26, 2007 | |
H029604
|
Yield Dynamics v. TEA Systems Corp.
Plaintiff who fails to establish elements showing misappropriation of trade secret blames adverse judgment on court's misconception of governing law. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 24, 2007 | |
05-16361
|
DirecTV Inc. v. Huynh
Court properly declines to grant default judgment for satellite television provider in piracy case where complaints fail to allege modification of electronic device. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 11, 2007 | |
05-15031
|
Zila Inc. v. Tinnell
Inventor of 1992 patent improvement must be determined where royalty payments contained in 1980 agreement are disputed. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 5, 2007 | |
H029604
|
Yield Dynamics Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.
Plaintiff who fails to establish elements showing misappropriation of trade secret blames adverse judgment on court's misconception of governing law. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 27, 2007 | |
06-16380
|
Grocery Outlet Inc. v. Albertson's Inc.
District court properly concludes Albertson's was legal owner of 'LUCKY' mark for retail grocery products and services in dispute against grocery competitor. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 9, 2007 | |
05-55627
|
Jada Toys Inc. v. Mattel Inc.
In trademark infringement case, district court errs by only considering one ‘Sleekcraft’ factor in its likelihood of confusion analysis. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 2, 2007 | |
B187691
|
Magic Kitchen LLC v. Good Things International LTD.
Trade dress infringement claim is time-barred by laches where company waited 10 years to file suit, without justification, and caused significant prejudice. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 31, 2007 | |
05-15170
|
Perfect 10 Inc. v. Visa International Service Association
Magazine’s contributory copyright infringement claim against payment processors is properly dismissed where there was no material contribution or inducement to actual infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 11, 2007 | |
06-56390
|
Hansen Beverage Co. v. National Beverage Corp.
District court improperly issues preliminary injunction to restrain marketing and sale of energy drinks in dispute over similarity between energy drink trade dresses. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 1, 2007 | |
04-57143
|
Perfect 10 Inc. v. CCBill LLC
In copyright suit brought by magazine publisher, it must be determined whether defendants reasonably implemented repeat infringer policy. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 4, 2007 | |
04-57143
|
Perfect 10 Inc. v. CCBill LLC
In copyright suit brought by magazine publisher, it must be determined whether defendants reasonably implemented repeat infringer policy. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 4, 2007 | |
06-56774
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Moose Creek Inc.
District court's denial of Abercrombie & Fitch's motion to preliminarily enjoin competitor's use of newly designed 'Moose' marks, is vacated and remanded. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 23, 2007 | |
06-55405
|
Perfect 10 Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.
Google thumbnails do not infringe Perfect 10's exclusive rights to copyrighted photographs of nude models. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 16, 2007 | |
04-17434
|
Kahle v. Gonzales
'Eldred v. Ashcroft' effectively addresses constitutional challenges to copyright extensions granted under Copyright Term Extension Act and Copyright Renewal Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 14, 2007 | |
05-1056
|
Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp.
Master copy of computer software sent to foreign manufacturer for installation on computers made and sold abroad does not constitute patent infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 3, 2007 | |
04-1350
|
KSR International v. Teleflex Inc.
Federal Circuit errs in analyzing patent infringement claim in a narrow and rigid manner inconsistent with the Patent Act. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 3, 2007 | |
05-35609
|
Jarvis v. K2 Inc.
Sporting goods manufacturer who altered and modified photographer's images for collage advertisements is not protected by collective works privilege. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 3, 2007 | |
05-55605
|
Rudolph International Inc. v. Realys Inc.
Nail file manufacturer's marketing term, 'disinfectable,' cannot enjoy trademark protection. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 20, 2007 | |
04-57143
|
Perfect 10 Inc. v. CCBill
In copyright suit brought by magazine publisher, it must be determined whether defendants reasonably implemented repeat infringer policy. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 5, 2007 | |
04-55373
|
Horphag Research v. Garcia
Website's use of trademarked mark as generic term to refer to both trademarked products and rival products constitutes trademark dilution. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 |