Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-17064
|
Surfvivor Media Inc. v. Survivor Productions
Reality show producers did not commit trademark infringement by creating mark similar to plaintiff's. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 13, 2005 | |
04-480
|
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster
Company that distributes free software to promote copyright infringement is liable for resulting acts of infringement by third parties, |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 5, 2005 | |
03-55894
|
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster Ltd.
Distributors of peer-to-peer file-sharing computer networking software are not liable for copyright infringements by users. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jul. 1, 2005 | |
04-55962
|
Bosley Medical Institute Inc. v. Kremer
Defendant must have bad faith intent to profit to be liable for cybersquatting. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 20, 2005 | |
01-56069
|
Silvers v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.
Assignee to infringement claim with no interest in copyright itself may not institute action for infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 20, 2005 | |
03-55823
|
Watec Co. Ltd. v. Liu
Court cannot award attorney fees based on jury finding that trademark infringement was intentional. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 20, 2005 | |
03-1237
|
Merck KGAA v. Integra Lifesciences I LTD
Drug maker did not infringe patents by supplying drugs for pre-clinical research. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 15, 2005 | |
00-57118
|
Grupo Gigante SA De CV v. Dallo & Co. Inc.
Mexican company can protect its trademark if mark achieved secondary meaning and is familiar to substantial percentage of consumers in relevant market. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Apr. 7, 2005 | |
03-16034
|
Rossi v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc.
Motion picture trade association had 'good faith belief' that website was illegally infringing on copyrights. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Mar. 18, 2005 | |
G033363
|
Superbrace Inc. v. Tidwell
California contract law permits patent licensee to transfer license without consent of licensor. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 14, 2005 | |
04-35031
|
PlayMakers LLC v. ESPN Inc.
Plaintiff did not demonstrate sufficient likelihood of success on merits to warrant injunction in trademark infringement case. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 21, 2005 | |
03-55238
|
Laparade v. Ivanova
Production companies enjoy rights as 'authors' of 34 Spanish-language motion pictures under Mexican law. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 10, 2005 | |
02-55983
|
Newton v. Diamond
Composer fails to demonstrate that rap group Beastie Boys' use of his composition was substantial enough for copyright infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 10, 2005 | |
03-409
|
KP Permanent Make-Up Inc. v. Lasting Impression I Inc.
Fair use defense in trademark infringement case does not shift burden of proof to defendant. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Dec. 15, 2004 | |
01-56055
|
KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v Lasting Impression I, Inc.
In trademark action between make-up manufacturers, court erred in finding that term 'micro colors' was generic and descriptive. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Dec. 8, 2004 | |
02-35856
|
Creative Computing v. Getloaded.com
Damage floor in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act contains no 'single act' requirement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Dec. 5, 2004 | |
03-55114
|
Jerry's Famous Deli Inc. v. Papanicolaou
Court will reconsider profits that restaurant owner should disgorge for unlawfully using 'Famous Deli' trademark. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 9, 2004 | |
03-35188
|
Polar Bear Productions Inc. v. Timex Corp.
Jury's award of damages against watchmaker for unauthorized use of footage from copyrighted film was not supported by sufficient evidence. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 25, 2004 | |
S124914
|
Jasmine Networks v. Marvell Semiconductor
Court erred in refusing to consider contents of voicemail when crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege applied. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 5, 2004 | |
02-57148
|
Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp.
Any commercial use of a famous mark is diluting regardless of whether it is confusing or combined with other identifiers. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 5, 2004 | |
03-35188
|
Polar Bear Productions Inc. v. Timex Corp.
Jury's award of damages against watchmaker for unauthorized use of footage from copyrighted film was not supported by sufficient evidence. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 7, 2004 | |
03-55033
|
Swirsky v. Carey
Court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Mariah Carey in copyright infringement suit. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 3, 2004 | |
03-55033
|
Swirsky v. Carey
Court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Mariah Carey in copyright infringement suit. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Aug. 24, 2004 | |
02-55797
|
Ellison v. Robertson
Author alleging unlawful sharing of his stories online may sue internet provider for copyright infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
02-56592
|
Kalantari v. NITV, Inc.
Iranian embargo did not prohibit commercial importation and copyrighting of Iranian movie in United States. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Mar. 11, 2004 | |
00-56648
|
Playboy Enterprises Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp.
Genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on trademark infringement and dilution claims. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Mar. 11, 2004 | |
01-56695
|
Mattel Inc. v. Walking Mountain Productions
Appellant's depiction of Barbie in his photographs did not amount to trademark infringement because of fair use. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 17, 2004 | |
02-2153
|
UMG Recordings Inc. v. Sinnott
Flea market owner that permitted vendors to sell pirated music is liable for copyright infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Feb. 13, 2004 | |
01-35352
|
Lamps Plus Inc. v. Seattle Lighting Fixture Co.
Lamp design that incorporated unacknowledged preexisting components led to invalid copyright. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 18, 2003 | |
02-55983
|
Newton v. Diamond
Composer fails to demonstrate that rap group Beastie Boys' use of his composition was substantial enough for copyright infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Nov. 12, 2003 |