Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09-50508
|
U.S. v. Spangle
Judge is not required to recuse himself where no evidence existed that defendant was going to act on implicit threat. |
Judges |
|
Nov. 21, 2010 | |
A125732
|
Benjamin, Weill & Mazer v. Kors
Arbitrator must disclose nature of legal practice and representation of law firm engaged in fee dispute with former client at time of arbitration. |
Judges |
|
Oct. 13, 2010 | |
09-35860
|
Kirk v. Carpeneti
Selection of Board of Governors of Alaska Bar Association by attorneys, rather than public at large, does not violate equal protection clause. |
Judges |
|
Sep. 30, 2010 | |
A126283
|
La Serena Properties v. Weisbach
Arbitrator who allegedly failed to make conflict of interest disclosures enjoys absolute arbitral immunity. |
Judges |
|
Aug. 5, 2010 | |
A126283
|
La Serena Properties v. Weisbach
Arbitrator who allegedly failed to make conflict of interest disclosures enjoys absolute arbitral immunity. |
Judges |
|
Jul. 16, 2010 | |
S150984
|
People v. Freeman
Judge’s refusal to disqualify himself does not violate defendant’s due process rights where actual bias did not exist. |
Judges |
|
Jan. 22, 2010 | |
A118254
|
Hernandez v. Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc.
Order barring attorney from communicating with class members valid where judge's later disqualification due to bias applied to future orders. |
Judges |
|
Jun. 19, 2009 | |
08-22
|
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. Inc.
Judge is recused from case involving his biggest campaign donor based on 'objective standards,' not actual proof of bias. |
Judges |
|
Jun. 9, 2009 | |
06-56454
|
Dawson v. Marshall
District judge may decide habeas petition on which he issued findings and recommendations in prior capacity as magistrate judge. |
Judges |
|
Mar. 9, 2009 | |
06-56454
|
Dawson v. Marshall
District judge may decide habeas petition on which he issued findings and recommendations in prior capacity as magistrate judge. |
Judges |
|
Feb. 10, 2009 | |
B207661
|
New Albertsons Inc. v. Superior Court (Shanahan)
Supermarket's motion to withdraw admission is improperly denied in case where patron is found bleeding on floor. |
Judges |
|
Dec. 12, 2008 | |
D050832
|
Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles
County of Los Angeles' practice of providing employment benefits to judges violates California Constitution. |
Judges |
|
Nov. 10, 2008 | |
D050832
|
Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles
County of Los Angeles' practice of providing employment benefits to judges violates California Constitution. |
Judges |
|
Oct. 14, 2008 | |
B204354
|
Haworth v. Superior Court (Ossakow)
Public censure for disparaging women on account of their physical attributes casts doubt on arbitrator's impartiality in cosmetic surgeon's malpractice case. |
Judges |
|
Aug. 4, 2008 | |
B204354
|
Haworth v. Superior Court (Ossakow)
Public censure for disparaging women on account of their physical attributes casts doubt on arbitrator's impartiality in cosmetic surgeon's malpractice case. |
Judges |
|
Jul. 29, 2008 | |
B204354
|
Haworth v. Superior Court (Ossakow)
Public censure for disparaging women on account of their physical attributes casts doubt on arbitrator's impartiality in cosmetic surgeon's malpractice case. |
Judges |
|
Jul. 14, 2008 | |
B196202
|
People v. Williams
Court’s bias, based on its opinion of defendant’s veracity, disqualifies it from further hearings, but does not void its ruling in instant matter. |
Judges |
|
Nov. 8, 2007 | |
06-30258
|
U.S. v. Holland
Judge has no duty to recuse himself in response to threatening phone messages defendant makes in attempt to manipulate court system. |
Judges |
|
Sep. 5, 2007 | |
G035681
|
Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics Inc.
Judgment for defendants in employment discrimination case reversed where trial judge's misconduct so infected proceedings as to deprive plaintiffs of fair trial. |
Judges |
|
Jul. 5, 2007 | |
G035681
|
Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics Inc.
Judgment for defendants in employment discrimination case reversed where trial judge's misconduct so infected proceedings as to deprive plaintiffs of fair trial. |
Judges |
|
Jun. 5, 2007 | |
G035681
|
Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics Inc.
Judgment for defendants in employment discrimination case reversed where trial judge's misconduct so infected proceedings as to deprive plaintiffs of fair trial. |
Judges |
|
Jun. 5, 2007 | |
B189963
|
Rossco Holdings Inc. v. Bank of America
If disqualified judge compels arbitration in which he has no input, resultant award should not be vacated solely by virtue of judge's disqualification. |
Judges |
|
May 14, 2007 | |
B195593
|
Bravo v. Superior Court (County of Los Angeles)
Plaintiff's peremptory challenge to judge is timely where second action against county is not continuation of earlier case. |
Judges |
|
Apr. 24, 2007 | |
B189963
|
Rossco Holdings Inc. v. Bank of America
If disqualified judge compels arbitration in which he has no input, resultant award should not be vacated solely by virtue of judge's disqualification. |
Judges |
|
Apr. 19, 2007 | |
D046394
|
People v. Freeman
Appearance of judicial bias that could undermine public's confidence in impartial judiciary raises due process concerns. |
Judges |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | |
H030303
|
In re Needles Cases
Party in coordinated action who successfully challenges summary judgment on appeal may later exercise peremptory challenge of judge presiding over coordinated proceedings. |
Judges |
|
Mar. 13, 2007 | |
B188779
|
North Beverly Park Homeowners Association v. Bisno
Judge cannot be regarded as having consented to disqualification where party's statement of disqualification was filed after final judgment. |
Judges |
|
Mar. 7, 2007 | |
B188549
|
Casden v. Superior Court (Casden)
Petitioner's second peremptory challenge was properly denied where he utilized his one available challenge upon remand. |
Judges |
|
Nov. 27, 2006 | |
C052769
|
Jonathon M. v. Superior Court (People)
Juvenile court judge abused her discretion when she refused to follow published opinion and also wrongfully denied peremptory challenge. |
Judges |
|
Oct. 23, 2006 | |
03-17181
|
Ignacio v. Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
When litigant indiscriminately sues all justices in Ninth Circuit, rule of necessity applies and no disqualification of justices is required. |
Judges |
|
Oct. 17, 2006 |