For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union v. Davis (Lawrence)
Proposition 5, which by statute authorizes gambling on American Indian land, conflicts with California Constitution and is therefore invalid. 		Native American Affairs Sep. 26, 2000
Desiree F., A Minor
Indian tribe must be notified of pending proceedings to terminate parental rights when child may be tribe member. 		Native American Affairs Sep. 20, 2000
Harrison v. Dept. of Interior
Order 		Native American Affairs Sep. 19, 2000
Laura F., a Minor
Indian Child Welfare Act's full faith and credit provision doesn't require court's adherence to tribal resolution that adoption isn't in child's best interest. 		Native American Affairs Aug. 31, 2000
Desiree F., a Minor
Indian tribe must be notified of pending proceedings to terminate parental rights when child may be tribe member. 		Native American Affairs Aug. 29, 2000
Turner v. Martire
Federal law enforcement officers of Indian tribe must show their conduct was discretionary and within scope of official duties for immunity. 		Native American Affairs Aug. 18, 2000
Manybeads v. United States
Indian tribe that receives compensation under accomodation agreement is necessary and indispensable party to Native American's action challenging the agreement. 		Native American Affairs Jun. 29, 2000
Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation v. Locke
Unconsenting state and its governor have immunity from Indian tribe's suit for operation of a state lottery on reservation land. 		Native American Affairs Jun. 19, 2000
Yakama Indian Nation v. State of Washington Department of Revenue
State doesn't consent to suit by Indian tribe by depositing proceeds of contraband cigarette sales in county registry and asserting sovereign immunity in responsive pleading. 		Native American Affairs Jun. 19, 2000
Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Wolf
Tribal courts lack jurisdiction over accident occurring on right-of-way granted by Congress. 		Native American Affairs Jun. 14, 2000
Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Red Wolf
Tribal courts lack jurisdiction over accident occurring on right-of-way granted by Congress. 		Native American Affairs Jun. 14, 2000
State of Montana v. King
American Indian tribe can't regulate state's employment practices for construction work on state-owned right of way crossing tribe's reservation. 		Native American Affairs Jun. 14, 2000
State v. Hicks
Tribal court has subject matter jurisdiction over claims against state officials for misconduct in enforcing tribal court-approved warrant on Indian land. 		Native American Affairs Jun. 9, 2000
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
Order 		Native American Affairs Apr. 18, 2000
U.S. v. Prentiss
District court lacks jurisdiction where the government does not allege or establish the Indian status of the accused or the victim. 		Native American Affairs Mar. 16, 2000
Hein v. Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians
District court lacks jurisdiction over Native American claims brought directly under Indian Civil Rights and Indian Gaming Regulatory Acts. 		Native American Affairs Feb. 10, 2000
HRI Inc. v. EPA
Under Safe Drinking Water Act, EPA may impose controls for underground injection processes on Indian lands. 		Native American Affairs Jan. 19, 2000
Oliver v. Sealaska Corp.
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act does not create independent cause of action for individual or class to enforce statute's revenue-sharing requirements. 		Native American Affairs Dec. 30, 1999
United States v. Hess
Federal law doesn't mandate that gravel is mineral within the meaning of patent reservation. 		Native American Affairs Dec. 10, 1999
Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe
'Coal,' as described in Coal Lands Act, doesn't encompass coalbed methane gas; therefore reservation of coal in land doesn't include gas. 		Native American Affairs Nov. 19, 1999
Osage Tribal Council v. U.S. Dept. of Labor
Statutory provision explicitly waiving tribal immunity isnt required to effect such waiver. 		Native American Affairs Nov. 7, 1999
Great Western Casinos Inc. v. Morongo Band of Mission Indians
A tribe nor its individual members waive sovereign immunity for the purposes of a law suit. 		Native American Affairs Oct. 22, 1999
State of Alaska v. Babbitt
Use and occupancy of land prior to filing Native allotment application, doesn't take priority over earlier grant of right of way to state. 		Native American Affairs Sep. 30, 1999
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.
Tribe, as successor in interest to coal reserved to government, is owner of coal bed methane. 		Native American Affairs Sep. 9, 1999
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie
Price-Anderson Act doesn't bar Tribal Court from determining its jurisdiction over member's personal injury claim. 		Native American Affairs Sep. 9, 1999
Clinton v. Babbitt
Members of Navajo Nation living on land belonging to Hopi Tribe can't proceed to court to dispute long-term leases where Hopi Tribe is an indispensable party. 		Native American Affairs Sep. 7, 1999
Blunk v. Arizona Dept. of Transportation
State can regulate non-Indian's commercial use of non-reservation land that is owned by Indian tribe. 		Native American Affairs Aug. 6, 1999
Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Wolf
District court cannot enjoin enforcement of tribal court's judgment before debtor exhausts tribal remedies. 		Native American Affairs Aug. 5, 1999
Babbit v. Youpee
Despite amendment, statute still impermissibly restricts right of individual Indians to direct descent of property. 		Native American Affairs Aug. 3, 1999
Stuart v. United States
Federal law pre-empts state anti-forfeiture statute regarding an installment land-sale contract of reservation land. 		Native American Affairs Jul. 29, 1999
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.