Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-35538
|
Tablada v. Thomas
Bureau of Prisons' methodology for calculating good time earned under 18 U.S.C. Section 3624(b) is both reasonable and persuasive. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 7, 2008 | |
07-30467
|
United States v. Tsui
Prisoners serving foreign sentences in United States are not entitled to their good time credits earned abroad. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 26, 2008 | |
07-70300
|
State of Arizona v. U.S. District Court
District court properly enforces scheduling order requiring defendants to investigate substance of prisoner's claims and file report about findings. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 10, 2008 | |
05-55829
|
Pierce v. County of Orange
When court orders relief relating to prison conditions, such relief shall continue if it is necessary to correct ongoing violation of right. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
May 16, 2008 | |
05-55829
|
Pierce v. County of Orange
When court orders relief relating to prison conditions, such relief shall continue if it is necessary to correct ongoing violation of right. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 26, 2008 | |
06-35068
|
Alvarez v. Hill
Court errs in failing to address RLUIPA claim where inmate's federal complaint satisfies minimal notice pleading requirements. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 14, 2008 | |
06-15972
|
O'Guinn v. Lovelock Correctional Center
Suit is properly dismissed where prisoner fails to exhaust administrative remedies before filing ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Sep. 5, 2007 | |
04-17459
|
Andrews v. Cervantes
Prisoner’s filing fees should be waived where he is in ‘imminent danger’ for being subjected to prisoners with serious contagious diseases. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 5, 2007 | |
04-17459
|
Andrews v. Cervantes
Prisoner’s filing fees should be waived where he is in ‘imminent danger’ for being subjected to prisoners with serious contagious diseases. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 27, 2007 | |
03-50524
|
U.S. v. Howard
District-wide policy of requiring pretrial detainees to wear leg shackles at their first appearance before magistrate judge does not violate due process. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
F049847
|
In re Arnett
State superior court has discretion to grant federal inmate's petition for legal name change because no law prohibits name changes by incarcerated inmates. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 19, 2007 | |
04-15770
|
Myron v. Terhune
State regulations governing inmate classifications did not create enforceable 14th Amendment liberty interest for prisoner. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Feb. 16, 2007 | |
04-36021
|
Phillips v. Hust
Prison librarian violated inmate's right to access to courts when she arbitrarily denied him access to equipment needed to prepare court documents. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Feb. 16, 2007 | |
D047042
|
In re Player
Prisoner is entitled to work-time behavioral credits/points for periods when his work status classification was interrupted without his fault. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Feb. 2, 2007 | |
05-7058
|
Jones v. Bock
Imposition of pleading requirements that are not mandatory under PLRA exceeds proper limits of judicial role. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jan. 26, 2007 | |
04-35608
|
Morgan v. Morgensen
Where prisoner's thumb was torn off at prison job, motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity is properly denied. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Dec. 7, 2006 | |
04-35608
|
Morgan v. Morgensen
Where prisoner's thumb was torn off at prison job, motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity is properly denied. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Dec. 1, 2006 | |
D046822
|
Escamilla v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
In case where inmate sought value of unreturned personal property, alleged facts were sufficient to support petition for writ of mandamus. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 25, 2006 | |
04-15770
|
Myron v. Terhune
State regulations governing prison administration did not create enforceable 14th Amendment liberty interests. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Oct. 17, 2006 | |
05-15650
|
Vaden v. Summerhill
Under Prison Litigation Reform Act, complaint is 'brought' by prisoner when he submits it to court, not when complaint is later filed. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Aug. 7, 2006 | |
B179103
|
Sanders v. Yarborough
Court's order relieving prisoner of obligation to pay fees and costs pertaining to lawsuit was erroneous, but binding until reversed. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Aug. 7, 2006 | |
03-16042
|
Ngo v. Woodford
Prisoner exhausted administrative remedies in internal appeals process before filing civil rights suit against prison. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jul. 3, 2006 | |
04-1739
|
Beard v. Banks
Prison officials have set forth adequate legal support for policy that forbids inmates any access to newspapers, magazines and photographs. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 29, 2006 | |
05-416
|
Woodford v. Ngo
Exhaustion requirement under Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 requires proper exhaustion of administrative remedies. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 28, 2006 | |
04-35280
|
Roles v. Maddox
Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 required prisoner challenging confiscation of magazines to exhaust his administrative remedies first. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 26, 2006 | |
04-15882
|
Jett v. Penner
Prisoner presented sufficient evidence to establish that prison personnel and physicians were deliberately indifferent to treating his fractured thumb. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 26, 2006 | |
04-55463
|
Long v. County of Los Angeles
Court reaffirms that issue of whether municipality has displayed policy of deliberate indifference to constitutional rights of citizens is generally jury question. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jun. 7, 2006 | |
04-15750
|
Panaro v. City of North Las Vegas
Participating in internal affairs investigation is not sufficient to satisfy exhaustion requirement of Prison Litigation Reform Act. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 16, 2006 | |
02-16325
|
Lira v. Herrera
Total exhaustion-dismissal rule is not required under Prison Litigation Reform Act. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Jan. 5, 2006 | |
04-55879
|
Warsoldier v. Woodford
Native American prisoner is entitled to religious exception from prison's hair grooming policy. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Nov. 11, 2005 |