Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14-55539
|
Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of America v. Hirsh
Denial of anti-SLAPP appealable and proper here where insurer's complaint did not arise from counsel's litigation-related conduct, but rather from his post-settlement conduct. |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
Aug. 4, 2016 | |
S225090
|
Baral v. Schnitt
Anti-SLAPP motion applies to 'mixed' causes of action containing allegations of both protected and unprotected activity. |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
Aug. 2, 2016 | |
C074796
|
Nam v. Regents of the University of California
Anti-SLAPP motion does not apply to harassment, discrimination suit as underlying claim is not about institution's protected activity, i.e., filing written complaints about plaintiff. |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
Aug. 1, 2016 |