Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S244630
|
OTO L.L.C. v. Kho
Arbitration agreement was unconscionable due to substantial procedural unconscionability based on coercive circumstances surrounding its execution, and sufficient substantive unconscionability based on its one-sided impacts on the signatory employee. |
Arbitration |
|
C. Corrigan | Aug. 30, 2019 |
G056249
|
Lopez v. Bartlett Care Center, LLC
Resident-Facility Arbitration Agreement was properly found unenforceable due to unconscionability, and the court deferred to the trial court's credibility determination favoring plaintiff in the face of conflicting evidence. |
Arbitration |
|
R. Aronson | Aug. 30, 2019 |
18-15281
|
Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.
'American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant' was intervening Supreme Court authority irreconcilable with 'Amaro v. Continental Can Co.', so ERISA claims may now be subject to mandatory arbitration. |
Arbitration |
|
B. Pearson | Aug. 21, 2019 |
E069833
|
Lacayo v. Catalina Restaurant Group Inc.
Trial court's order leaving decision on classwide arbitration to the arbitrator was not appealable, and the parties' arbitration agreement contained a specific exemption for unfair competition claims. |
Arbitration |
|
D. Miller | Aug. 5, 2019 |
C080940
|
Valentine v. Plum Healthcare Group, LLC
Defendants did not establish that plaintiff signed arbitration agreements as decedent's agent; thus plaintiff could not bind his children to arbitrate wrongful death claims. |
Arbitration |
|
H. Hull | Jul. 29, 2019 |
17-17227
|
Newirth v. Aegis Senior Communities
Defendant waived its right to arbitrate because defendant made intentional decision not to compel arbitration in order to take advantage of judicial forum, and plaintiffs were prejudiced by incurring costs. |
Arbitration |
|
S. Ikuta | Jul. 25, 2019 |
17-17221
|
Blair v. Rent-A-Center
California Supreme Court 'McGill' rule is 'generally applicable contract defense' not preempted by FAA, and invalidates arbitration clause that purports to waive an individual's right to seek public injunctive relief. |
Arbitration |
|
W. Fletcher | Jul. 1, 2019 |
B289308
|
Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz LLP v. Kim
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1294(a) did not apply to mandatory fee arbitration under the Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act, so appellant's appeal was not authorized by statute. |
Arbitration |
|
G. Weingart | May 31, 2019 |
S243029
|
Heimlich v. Shivji
Statutory arbitration scheme provided no recourse for vacation or correction where arbitrator refused, mistakenly or not, to award costs based on a belief in lack of jurisdiction. |
Arbitration |
|
C. Corrigan | May 31, 2019 |
18-70568
|
In Re Holl
The district court did not clearly err by determining that plaintiff assented to terms on store website which incorporated an arbitration clause; thus writ of mandamus petition was denied. |
Arbitration |
|
M. Hawkins | May 31, 2019 |
G056585
|
Nunez v. Nevell Group, Inc.
Defendant waived its right to compel arbitration by advising trial court in writing that it would not file motion to compel arbitration and by delaying filling of motion and prejudicing plaintiff. |
Arbitration |
|
R. Fybel | May 30, 2019 |
18-15203
|
Lambert v. Tesla
Under the reasoning of 'EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps' addressing the arbitrability of Title VII claims, Section 1981 claims are also arbitrable. |
Arbitration |
|
M. Smith | May 20, 2019 |
G055053
|
Muller v. Roy Miller Freight Lines, LLC
Where transportation worker plays 'integral role' in transporting goods through interstate commerce, FAA exemption applies though worker himself did not cross state lines. |
Arbitration |
|
R. Aronson | May 2, 2019 |
17-988
|
Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela
Ambiguity as to classwide arbitration in employment contract 'does not provide sufficient basis to conclude' parties agreed to decide classwide matters in arbitration, notwithstanding state contract law principles. |
Arbitration |
|
J. Roberts | Apr. 25, 2019 |
17-35703
|
Castro v. Tri Marine Fish Co
A settlement agreement and confirming order do not constitute an arbitral award under the New York Convention and Convention Act simply because they are signed in the presence of an arbitrator. |
Arbitration |
|
M. McKeown | Apr. 16, 2019 |
17-35703
|
Castro v. Tri Marine Fish Co.
A settlement agreement and confirming order do not constitute an arbitral award under the New York Convention and Convention Act simply because they are signed in the presence of an arbitrator. |
Arbitration |
|
M. McKeown | Feb. 28, 2019 |
D073798
|
Correia v. NB Baker Electric, Inc.
'Iskanian,' not 'Epic,' binds California intermediate appellate courts on the issue of whether governmental disputes, including PAGA claims, are subject to the Federal Arbitration Act. |
Arbitration |
|
J. Haller | Feb. 26, 2019 |
B287696
|
Vasquez v. San Miguel Produce, Inc.
An agency or similar relationship, such as being co-employers, between the nonsignatory and one of the parties to an arbitration agreement allows enforcement of the arbitration agreement by the nonsignatory. |
Arbitration |
|
S. Perren | Feb. 1, 2019 |
17-16510
|
Aspic Engineering and Construction v. ECC Centcom Constructors
Where arbitrator's award 'fails to draw its essence from' underlying parties' agreement as to conditional construction subcontracts in Afghanistan, vacatur proper. |
Arbitration |
|
M. Smith | Jan. 29, 2019 |
17-340
|
New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira
A court should decide whether the Federal Arbitration Act's Section 1 "contracts of employment" exclusion applies before invoking the statutory powers of the Act to stay litigation and compel arbitration. |
Arbitration |
|
N. Gorsuch | Jan. 16, 2019 |
17-1272
|
Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.
Where parties contract to have arbitrator decide threshold arbitrability question, court 'possesses no power to decide' said question, even where it believes motion for arbitration is 'wholly groundless.' |
Arbitration |
|
B. Kavanaugh | Jan. 9, 2019 |
17-15965
|
Stevens v. Jiffy Lube Int'l
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) governs how to calculate the Federal Arbitration Act's three-month filing deadline; thus, appellants were one day late in filing their petition to vacate the arbitral award. |
Arbitration |
|
M. McKeown | Dec. 28, 2018 |
A154298
|
Howard v. Goldbloom
Arbitration is not proper when a dispute is based on obligations independent and outside the scope of an employment relationship; thus, parties' dispute not subject to arbitration. |
Arbitration |
|
A. Tucher | Dec. 26, 2018 |
16-16754
|
Local Joint Exec. Bd. v. Mirage Casino-Hotel
Whether a collective bargaining agreement creates a duty for the parties to arbitrate a particular grievance, is a question for judicial determination unless the parties 'clearly and unmistakably provide otherwise.' |
Arbitration |
|
E. Bucklo | Dec. 14, 2018 |
A153390
|
Modification: Ramos v. Superior Court
Arbitration agreement unconscionable under minimum requirements of 'Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.' because it limited employee's remedies and provided that employee must bear half the costs of arbitration. |
Arbitration |
|
S. Margulies | Nov. 30, 2018 |
A153390
|
Ramos v. Superior Court
Arbitration agreement unconscionable under minimum requirements of 'Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.' because it limited employee's remedies and provided that employee must bear half the costs of arbitration. |
Arbitration |
|
S. Margulies | Nov. 6, 2018 |
14-16078
|
O'Connor v. Uber
District court's denial of Uber's motion to compel arbitration was reversed; the question of arbitrability was designated to the arbitrator. |
Arbitration |
|
R. Clifton | Sep. 26, 2018 |
G055201
|
Branches Neighborhood Corp. v. CalAtlantic Group, Inc.
When the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of an association require consent to file a claim, public policy requires the court to follow its plain language; thus the arbitrator did not exceed its powers. |
Arbitration |
|
E. Moore | Aug. 28, 2018 |
E066242
|
Fuentes v. TMCSF, Inc.
A trial court properly denied a motion to compel arbitration, where the moving party was not a signatory to the agreement which contained the arbitration provision at issue. |
Arbitration |
|
M. Ramirez | Aug. 27, 2018 |
A151677
|
Maplebear v. Busick
Partial final arbitration award that speaks to preliminary issue but 'leaves unanswered almost every question' raised in arbitration demand is not an 'award' on which superior court can act. |
Arbitration |
|
M. Miller | Aug. 23, 2018 |