Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A126844
|
Fair v. Bakhtiari
Attorney may not amend complaint to include quantum meruit action following finding that attorney improperly entered into business transaction with client. |
Attorneys |
|
May 25, 2011 | |
G043230
|
Scott C. Moody Inc. v. Starr Surgical Co.
Court properly imposes sanctions against attorney for knowingly violating order forbidding attorney from asking witness about specific issue. |
Attorneys |
|
May 24, 2011 | |
B215544
|
Carpenter & Zuckerman v. Cohen
Law firm is not entitled to recover attorney fees where firm hires its own associate as representative in appellate proceedings. |
Attorneys |
|
May 11, 2011 | |
A127784
|
Richards v. Sequoia Insurance Co.
Attorney plaintiffs who brought breach of contract action in propria persona cannot recover attorney fees for time spent in defending own case. |
Attorneys |
|
May 11, 2011 | |
C063214
|
Schimmel v. Levin
Court has authority to strike pleadings filed by disqualified attorney who possessed adverse confidential information on plaintiff in interest of justice. |
Attorneys |
|
May 6, 2011 | |
B222603
|
Lemmer v. Charney
Attorney may not require client to promise to proceed to trial or enter settlement as part of contingency fee agreement. |
Attorneys |
|
May 6, 2011 | |
B219626
|
Rogel v. Lynwood Redevelopment Agency
In applying negative multiplier to set amount of attorney fees, trial court must not use public entity's status to negate appropriate lodestar. |
Attorneys |
|
May 3, 2011 | |
B222455
|
Liberty National Enterprises L.P. v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.
Attorney disqualification is impliedly waived where delay in bringing disqualification motion was unreasonable and caused extreme prejudice to opponent. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 26, 2011 | |
B221338
|
Callahan v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Execution of partnership agreement does not constitute actual injury sufficient to trigger limitations period for legal malpractice action. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 19, 2011 | |
G044223
|
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. Superior Court (City of Newport Beach)
Agreement with law firm for matter-by-matter representation does not create attorney-client relationship that would disqualify firm in subsequent representation. |
Attorneys |
|
Mar. 24, 2011 | |
B216392
|
Blue Water Sunset LLC v. Markowitz
Limited liability company member which filed action against second member may move to disqualify attorney who represented company and second member with conflicting interests. |
Attorneys |
|
Feb. 3, 2011 | |
B216650
|
Brown v. Grimes
Attorney is excused from further obligation under fee-sharing agreement where other attorney failed to perform contractual responsibility to pay third party. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 31, 2011 | |
A127375
|
Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail Inc.
Representation of class members in two cases does not require disqualification since putative class members are not ‘clients’ and no conflict exists. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 19, 2011 | |
S178914
|
Cassel v. Superior Court (Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Pearson LLP)
Absent express waiver of confidentiality, private attorney-client communications related to mediation with third party are inadmissible in malpractice suit. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 14, 2011 | |
C059133
|
Holmes v. Petrovich Development Co. LLC
Attorney-client privilege does not protect e-mails sent to attorney via defendant company's computer where company told plaintiff that e-mail would be inspected. |
Attorneys |
|
Jan. 14, 2011 | |
C058943
|
Olsen v. Harbison
Attorney who was later fired by client cannot seek fees under quantum meruit from second attorney pursuant to fee-division agreement. |
Attorneys |
|
Dec. 28, 2010 | |
A124199
|
City of Santa Rosa v. Patel
Lodestar method of calculating attorney fees is applicable in red light abatement case because it provides more predictability than using cost-plus method. |
Attorneys |
|
Dec. 22, 2010 | |
A108410
|
Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection
Party is entitled to attorney fees as successful litigant despite partial reversal of claims where significant benefit is shown by effectuation of policy. |
Attorneys |
|
Dec. 16, 2010 | |
06-o-13329
|
Allen v. State Bar
Attorney is not subject to disciplinary action where no attorney-client relationship existed at time of negotiation and sale of friend's duplex. |
Attorneys |
|
Nov. 22, 2010 | |
B225264
|
Arnall v. Superior Court (Liker)
Contingency fee agreement between attorney and client is voidable where written agreement fails to state fee is negotiable. |
Attorneys |
|
Nov. 22, 2010 | |
A108410
|
Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection
Party is entitled to attorney fees as successful litigant despite partial reversal of claims where significant benefit is shown by effectuation of policy. |
Attorneys |
|
Nov. 21, 2010 | |
G042297
|
PNEC Corp. v. Meyer
Court may award attorney fees to moving party under Civil Code Section 1717 where action on contract was dismissed due to inconvenient forum. |
Attorneys |
|
Nov. 17, 2010 | |
A127025
|
E-Pass Technologies Inc. v. Moses & Singer LLP
State court has subject-matter jurisdiction over legal malpractice claim where damages are based on attorneys’ exercise of reasonable care, not patent law. |
Attorneys |
|
Nov. 7, 2010 | |
B206679
|
Moore v. Kaufman
Attorney fee award against plaintiff's counsel based on anti-SLAPP motion is void, and counsel may defend herself on that ground in contempt proceeding. |
Attorneys |
|
Oct. 24, 2010 | |
D056972
|
Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino (Hawarden Development Co.)
Remand is necessary for fee award that was arbitrarily reduced, suggesting court did not take complexities of appellate work into consideration. |
Attorneys |
|
Oct. 18, 2010 | |
B221940
|
Leonard Carder LLP v. Patten, Faith & Sandford
'Actual controversy' over distribution of attorney fees exists where law firm claimed entitlement to 40 percent of fee in excess of $12 million. |
Attorneys |
|
Oct. 12, 2010 | |
F057802
|
Smith v. Selma Community Hospital
Court must award attorney fees if other party litigated lawsuit in bad faith, which is determined with subjective standard regarding motive for litigating. |
Attorneys |
|
Sep. 27, 2010 | |
A126149
|
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy v. Universal Paragon Corp.
Attorney fee awarded by arbitrator based on percentage of property value stipulated by agreement between parties is not unconscionable. |
Attorneys |
|
Sep. 22, 2010 | |
D056972
|
Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino (Hawarden Development Co.)
Remand is necessary for fee award that was arbitrarily reduced, suggesting court did not take complexities of appellate work into consideration. |
Attorneys |
|
Sep. 20, 2010 | |
F057802
|
Smith v. Selma Community Hospital
Court must award attorney fees if other party litigated lawsuit in bad faith, which is determined with subjective standard regarding motive for litigating. |
Attorneys |
|
Sep. 2, 2010 |