| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G034588 | McElroy v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. Lender was not required to process tendered payment in form of 'Bonded Bill of Exchange Order' because bill was worthless on its face. | Banking |  | Feb. 8, 2006 | |
| 04-16334 | American Bankers Assoc. v. Gould Federal credit reporting act preempts at least portion of state privacy law's affiliate-sharing provisions. | Banking |  | Sep. 27, 2005 | |
| 03-55852 | Virachack v. University Ford Cash rebate is not part of cost of credit and need not be disclosed under Truth In Lending Act. | Banking |  | Aug. 30, 2005 | |
| 03-55575 | Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corp. District court erred in dismissing homeowner's complaint for failure to state cause of action under Truth In Lending Act. | Banking |  | Aug. 23, 2005 | |
| G033169 | Wolski v. Fremont Investment & Loan Yield spread premium is not part of points and fees paid by borrower at close of escrow under predatory lending law. | Banking |  | Aug. 3, 2005 | |
| B164022 | TME Enterprises Inc. v. Norwest Corp. Bank can accept incoming wire transfer with beneficiary that does not match name on account as long as it is unaware of discrepancy. | Banking |  | Jun. 17, 2005 | |
| G033169 | Wolski v. Fremont Investment & Loan Yield spread premium is not included in 'points and fees' of residential mortgage loan. | Banking |  | Apr. 12, 2005 | |
| 03-35041 | Easter v. American West Financial Under Washington law, brokers who arrange table-funded loans need not be licensed. | Banking |  | Jan. 18, 2005 | |
| B169885 | DBJJJ Inc. v. National City Bank When bank fails to timely examine documents, it is precluded from arguing documentary presentation is inadequate. | Banking |  | Jan. 10, 2005 | |
| 02-56357 | McCarthy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Debtor challenging loan practices of bank that went into receivership must exhaust administrative remedies before filing lawsuit. | Banking |  | Jun. 30, 2004 | |
| A100172 | Olson v. Six Rivers National Bank Bank did not violate Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act by requesting credit information pertaining to husband in connection with loan made to wife. | Banking |  | Oct. 15, 2003 | |
| A097959 | Lee v. Yang Jilted fiancee who had joint interest in checking account could withdraw funds without restriction. | Banking |  | Oct. 15, 2003 | |
| D040165 | Fischer v. First International Bank When loan agreement doesn't state loans will be cross-collateralized, enforcement of "dragnet" clause presents triable issue; order granting new trial is void. | Banking |  | Oct. 1, 2003 | |
| D040390 | Byars v. SCME Mortgage Bankers Inc. Lender was authorized to pay rebate to mortgage broker on loan with limited origination fees. | Banking |  | Aug. 11, 2003 | |
| 00-71547 | De La Fuente v. FDIC Board must reconsider permanent removal of bank director who arranged self-interested loans. | Banking |  | Aug. 3, 2003 | |
| A096725 | Hirsch v. Bank of America Plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claim based on excessive bank fees charged to title companies and passed onto plaintiffs survives demurrer. | Banking |  | Jun. 25, 2003 | |
| 01-36076 | Bjustrom v. Trust One Mortgage Corp. Lender's payment of yield spread premiums and service release premiums to mortgage broker doesn't violate law or breach loan agreement. | Banking |  | Apr. 1, 2003 | |
| E029823 | Gibson v. World Savings and Loan Association Plaintiffs' state claims are not pre-empted by federal regulations of Home Owners' Loan Act. | Banking |  | Feb. 4, 2003 | |
| 00-17338 | Miguel v. Country Funding Corp. (Dubin) Subject matter jurisdiction does not exist where homeowner failed to notify bank of cancellation within three-year period. | Banking |  | Jan. 15, 2003 | |
| 00-16355 | The Bank of America v. City and County of San Francisco City ordinances prohibiting banks from charging ATM fees to nondepositors are pre-empted by federal banking laws. | Banking |  | Nov. 5, 2002 | |
| A095229 | Espresso Roma Corp. v. Bank of America Complaint against bank for payment of forged checks is properly dismissed where bank established prima facie case that it exercised ordinary care. | Banking |  | Oct. 8, 2002 | |
| G029283 | Park Terrace Limited v. Teasdale Summary judgment is proper in actions against lender based on exemption for loans arranged by licensed real estate broker. | Banking |  | Oct. 2, 2002 | |
| B155266 | Cochran Investment Co. Inc. v. Bank of America Delayed discovery of bank's liability for taking negotiated instrument from fiduciary will not be barred by statute of limitations. | Banking |  | Sep. 24, 2002 | |
| 01-0004 | Universal Marketing and Entertainment Inc. v. Bank One of Arizona Creditor did not commit conversion by garnishing account that contained unsegragated funds. | Banking |  | Sep. 23, 2002 | |
| 00-15635 | Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank Bank's compliance with unlawful Article 32 subpoena without obtaining certificate of compliance from Army isn't exempt from Right to Financial Privacy Act. | Banking |  | Sep. 17, 2002 | |
| 00-36014 | Gold Country Lenders v. Smith (In re Smith) Borrower must establish detrimental reliance to receive actual damages resulting from creditor's violation of Truth In Lending Act. | Banking |  | Aug. 8, 2002 | |
| G028243 | The Money Store Investment Corp. v. Southern California Bank Triable issue of fact exists concerning bank's dispersal of loan proceeds contrary to escrow instructions. | Banking |  | Aug. 7, 2002 | |
| 01-0021 | Trustmark Insurance Co. v. Bank One, Arizona, NA When 'Letter of Instructions' imposes conditions other than time of payment, it is not 'payment order' under UCC. | Banking |  | Jun. 18, 2002 | |
| 01-50083 | U.S. v. Boren Federal statute criminalizes false statements in connection with any bank application or commitment, not just those relating to loans. | Banking |  | Mar. 26, 2002 | |
| 01-3002 | U.S. v. Schild Sentencing for bank fraud conviction may be enhanced according to 'intended' rather than actual loss. | Banking |  | Dec. 13, 2001 | 
 

 
