Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
23-15825
|
In re: US v. Warfield
Pro rata allocation of proceeds that were insufficient to pay tax and penalty portions of tax lien including both where trustee avoided penalty portion was inconsistent with the Bankruptcy Code. |
Bankruptcy |
|
A. De Alba | Sep. 4, 2024 |
22-55944
|
In re: Kirkland and Rund
Mens rea instruction for a Ponzi scheme was unnecessary because fraudulent intent is presumed from evidence of the existence of a Ponzi scheme established through objective criteria. |
Bankruptcy |
|
G. Sanchez | Aug. 26, 2024 |
22-16948
|
Cogan v. Trabucco
Federal action seeking to collaterally attack state court judgement was not barred because the underlying case arose in the bankruptcy court and was within the federal courts' exclusive jurisdiction. |
Civil Procedure, Bankruptcy |
|
D. Collins | Aug. 22, 2024 |
22-60046
|
In re: Timothy L. Blixseth
Sovereign immunity shielded state from adversary proceeding filed by debtor seeking to recover costs resulting from involuntary bankruptcy petition because the proceeding was not necessary to effectuate bankruptcy court's jurisdiction. |
Bankruptcy, Immunity |
|
J. Rawlinson | Aug. 15, 2024 |
22-60050
|
In re: Masingale
Chapter 7 trustee was not required to object in the 30-day window to an above-limit homestead exemption where the case was Chapter 11 at the time and debtor represented that creditors would be paid first. |
Bankruptcy |
|
D. Bress | Jul. 29, 2024 |
23-124
|
Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
Bankruptcy code does not authorize a Chapter 11 reorganization plan to include provisions that effectively seek to discharge claims against a nondebtor without the consent of affected claimants. |
Bankruptcy |
|
N. Gorsuch | Jun. 28, 2024 |
22-1238
|
United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC
Prospective parity was appropriate remedy for short-lived disparity created by unconstitutional bankruptcy fee statute because that was the remedy Congress would have intended had it known the statute was unconstitutional. |
Bankruptcy, Remedies |
|
K. Jackson | Jun. 17, 2024 |
22-1079
|
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co.
An insurer with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims is a "party in interest" that "may raise and may appear and be heard on any issue" in a Chapter 11 case. |
Bankruptcy |
|
S. Sotomayor | Jun. 7, 2024 |
22-16463
|
Bercy v. City of Phoenix
Hostile work environment claims that were part of an ongoing pattern of conduct taking place before a bankruptcy filing belonged to the bankruptcy estate. |
Bankruptcy |
|
A. Johnstone | May 31, 2024 |
22-16711
|
Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico v. Earley
Staying securities fraud proceedings as to individual defendants during corporate Chapter 11 proceedings for judicial efficiency was inappropriate without weighing potential prejudice to shareholder plaintiffs in the fraud action. |
Civil Procedure, Bankruptcy |
|
D. Forrest | May 6, 2024 |
23-1120
|
In re: Maria Teresa Melendez Rey
Rental duplex did not qualify for California automatic homestead exemption because it was not necessary for her use even though it was located on the same parcel as her residence. |
Bankruptcy |
|
G. Spraker | Apr. 26, 2024 |
23-1024
|
In re: Lenore L. Albert-Sheridan
California State Bar's attempt to collect discovery sanctions and disciplinary costs violated the automatic stay imposed while formerly suspended lawyer was in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. |
Bankruptcy |
|
G. Spraker | Apr. 3, 2024 |
23-60017
|
Licup v. Jefferson Avenue Temecula LLC
Failure to provide a correct mailing address for a judgment creditor that resulted in the creditor not filing a timely proof of claim rendered the judgment debt nondischargeable. |
Bankruptcy |
|
H. Thomas | Mar. 19, 2024 |
23-1057
|
In re: Scott Warren Cohen
Relief from stay was warranted so creditor-former wife could liquidate her claims against her debtor-former husband even if the evidence needed to establish those claims related to other time-barred claims. |
Bankruptcy |
|
F. Corbit | Feb. 8, 2024 |
23‐1112
|
In re: Kirk Eugene Frantz and Mary Elizabeth Frantz
Attorney's unprofessional conduct was not sufficient to warrant the imposition of sua sponte sanctions under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure where the conduct was not roughly equivalent to contempt. |
Bankruptcy |
|
R. Faris | Jan. 30, 2024 |
22-60055
|
In re: Mckee v. Anderson
Debtor was not entitled to automatic homestead exemption for property where she did not reside despite testimony she intended to return because her conduct indicated a lack of such intent. |
Bankruptcy |
|
K. Lee | Jan. 18, 2024 |
D080534
|
Martin v. Gladstone
Because bankruptcy trustee did not file to abandon property until after injury occurred, trustee was still a responsible party. |
Bankruptcy |
|
W. Dato | Oct. 20, 2023 |
21-55967
|
Amended Opinion: Clifton Capital Group, LLC v. Sharp
Unsecured creditor's alleged injury was too conjectural to object to trustee's compensation enhancement where the debtor's bankruptcy plan proposed to pay allowed claims in full. |
Bankruptcy |
|
R. Nelson | Sep. 15, 2023 |
21-55643
|
USA Sales, Inc. v. Office of the United States Trustee
Refund of excess fees was the appropriate remedy where Chapter 11 bankruptcy debtor paid quarterly fees to the United States Trustee that were later declared to be unconstitutional. |
Bankruptcy |
|
J. Owens | Aug. 11, 2023 |
22-35604
|
Castleman v. Burman
Post-petition increase in Chapter 13 bankruptcy debtors' home's value became the property of the bankruptcy estate upon the conversion of their case to Chapter 7. |
Bankruptcy |
|
M. Hawkins | Jul. 31, 2023 |
23-1008
|
In re: RS Air, LLC
Creditors' suit against debtor's alleged alter egos did not violate bankruptcy discharge injunction because the discharge injunction was limited to the debtor personally. |
Bankruptcy |
|
R. Faris | Jun. 22, 2023 |
22-227
|
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin
The Bankruptcy Code unambiguously abrogates the sovereign immunity of all governments, including federally recognized Indian tribes. |
Bankruptcy |
|
K. Jackson | Jun. 16, 2023 |
22-35216
|
Evans v. McCallister
Chapter 13 Trustee was not entitled to any fees from funds paid pursuant to a proposed bankruptcy plan when the Chapter 13 case was dismissed before the plan was confirmed. |
Bankruptcy |
|
M. Smith | Jun. 13, 2023 |
NV-22-1144-BGC
|
In re: Bella Hospitality Group, LLC
Order for relief was appropriate despite creditor's failure to include statement of motivation for commencing involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy case because alleged debtor did not timely dispute the petition. |
Bankruptcy |
|
J. Brand | May 16, 2023 |
21-55967
|
Clifton Capital Group, LLC v. Sharp
Unsecured creditor's alleged injury was too conjectural to object to trustee's compensation enhancement where the debtor's bankruptcy plan proposed to pay allowed claims in full. |
Bankruptcy |
|
R. Nelson | May 9, 2023 |
NV-22-1174-CBG
|
In re: Simon Vernon Rodriguez and Marilyn Kay Schipull
Summary judgment was appropriate where there were no genuine issues of material fact regarding whether state court judgment against debtor was for violation of securities laws. |
Bankruptcy |
|
F. Corbit | May 4, 2023 |
21-1270
|
MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
Statutory limitation in bankruptcy code shielding good-faith purchaser from the effects of a court's modification or reversal of a lease assignment was not a jurisdictional provision. |
Bankruptcy |
|
K. Jackson | Apr. 20, 2023 |
21-908
|
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
Bankruptcy code excepts debts for money obtained by fraud from discharge regardless of the individual debtor's culpability for the underlying fraud. |
Bankruptcy |
|
A. Barrett | Feb. 23, 2023 |
NC-22-1103-SGB
|
In re E. Mark Moon
Settlement agreement arranged without licensed real estate broker that extended maturity date of original loan arranged by licensed real estate broker was usurious forbearance. |
Bankruptcy |
|
G. Spraker | Feb. 10, 2023 |
B308644
|
Akhlaghpour v. Orantes
Former Chapter 11 debtor-in-possession may have standing to pursue malpractice claims for actions taken by debtor's court-appointed counsel after trustee was appointed and ended counsel's court-appointed status. |
Bankruptcy |
|
G. Howard | Dec. 15, 2022 |